Analyzing larger sample sets with rapid methods: Incomplete-block designs with free-sorting and free-linking tasks

dc.contributor.authorAc-Pangan, Marlonen
dc.contributor.authorTejedor-Romero, Marinoen
dc.contributor.authorSwatko, Kyraen
dc.contributor.authorOrden, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorLahne, Jacoben
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-12T17:48:45Zen
dc.date.available2024-01-12T17:48:45Zen
dc.date.issued2024-04en
dc.description.abstractAs rapid, holistic methods for similarity and description—such as sorting and projective mapping—have grown in popularity, a limiting factor is the number of samples that can be presented to subjects: more than 25 food samples decreases the quality and stability of results. While incomplete-block designs could address this, their use has not been developed for these holistic methods. In this paper we present an empirical investigation into the use of incomplete-block designs with free sorting and the newer free linking. We compare these two methods because while their results are comparable, the cognitive tasks are different, and thus their suitability for incomplete-block designs may differ. We evaluated the effects of incomplete-block designs in two studies. In Study 1, 20 subjects evaluated 6/10 chocolate bars by free linking in an incomplete-block design, with each subject completing 2 blocks; results were compared to a complete-block evaluation of the 10 bars by free sorting and free linking. In Study 2, a total of 90 subjects evaluated 62 terms from a chocolate flavor-wheel in 3 conditions (between subjects): free sorting with complete blocks (N = 30, all 62 terms) and free sorting (N = 30) or free linking (N = 30) with 3 incomplete blocks of 16/62 terms. We introduce a novel method to evaluate stability for the incomplete-block designs that we call “pairwise simulation.” From Study 1, we find that pairwise simulation provides adequate stability estimates and that, with sufficient pairwise cooccurrences, free linking with incomplete blocks produces results that are comparable to free sorting or linking with complete blocks. From Study 2, we demonstrate that free linking with incomplete blocks can produce high quality results from a large sample set, maintaining the increased discrimination capacity that marks free linking in general, and that with incomplete blocks, free linking is likely to be more stable than free sorting. This research demonstrates that incomplete-block designs can be used with free linking, and also provides a new, effective method through pairwise simulation for evaluating stability with incomplete-block designs, which cannot be resampled using standard bootstrapping approaches.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDavid Orden is partially supported by Project Project PID2019-104129 GB-I00/MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. Marlon Ac-Pangan and Jacob Lahne are partially supported through USDA-NIFA AFRI Award #2020-6800631682. This research did not receive any additional external funding.en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/117346en
dc.identifier.volume113en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectFree sortingen
dc.subjectFree linkingen
dc.subjectIncomplete-block designsen
dc.subjectRapid methodsen
dc.subjectSensometricsen
dc.subjectSimulation methodsen
dc.titleAnalyzing larger sample sets with rapid methods: Incomplete-block designs with free-sorting and free-linking tasksen
dc.title.serialFood Quality and Preferenceen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Incomplete Linking Manuscript R3 - CLEAN.pdf
Size:
4.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: