New York Times’ and Wall Street Journal’s Coverage of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): A Content Analysis

dc.contributor.authorPaniagua-Pardo, Estefanyen
dc.date.accessed2019-01-02en
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-25T16:45:56Zen
dc.date.available2019-01-25T16:45:56Zen
dc.date.issued2018-04-17en
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates how Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) has been depicted in the U.S specifically by examining the media’s coverage of immigration during the Obama and Trump presidencies in two elite newspapers, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal between June 2012 (when DACA was signed into law) and October 2017 (9 months into Trump’s presidential term). The findings from the analysis indicate that the tone of the newspapers’ coverage of DACA was both negative and conflict oriented. The news articles were consistently unfavorable; out of a total of 170 articles analyzed and examined, 53.83% were negatively toned compared to only 14.93% that were positively toned and 31.24% that were neutral.en
dc.description.sponsorshipHonors Projectsen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttps://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1668&context=honorsprojectsen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/86904en
dc.identifier.volumeNumber 680en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherHonors Projectsen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectundocumented studentsen
dc.subjectDACA programen
dc.subjectUniversities and colleges--Studentsen
dc.subjectsocial constructionen
dc.titleNew York Times’ and Wall Street Journal’s Coverage of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): A Content Analysisen
dc.typeReporten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NewYorkTimesWallStreetJournalDACA.pdf
Size:
3.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format