Potential for Yield Improvement in Combined Rip-First and Crosscut-First Rough Mill Processing
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, R. Edward | en |
dc.contributor.author | Buehlmann, Urs | en |
dc.contributor.department | Sustainable Biomaterials | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-27T14:29:08Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-27T14:29:08Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Traditionally, lumber cutting systems in rough mills have either first ripped lumber into wide strips and then crosscut the resulting strips into component lengths (rip-first), or first crosscut the lumber into component lengths, then ripped the segments to the required widths (crosscut-first). Each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Crosscut-first typically works best for the production of wider components, while rip-first favors the production of narrower and longer components. Thus, whichever type of processing method is selected for a given rough mill usually depends on the characteristics of the cutting bills the mill expects to process. There is a third option, a dual-line mill that contains both ripfirst and crosscut-first processing streams. To date, such mills have been rare for a variety of reasons, complexity and cost being among them. However, dual-line systems allow the mill to respond to varying cutting bill size demands as well as to board characteristics that favor one method (rip-first or crosscut-first) over the other. Using the Rough Mill Simulator (ROMI 4), this paper examines the yield improvement potential of dual-line processing over single-system processing (i.e., rip-first or crosscut-first processing alone) for a variety of cutting bills and lumber grade mixes. | en |
dc.description.admin | Public domain – authored by a U.S. government employee | en |
dc.description.notes | The work upon which this publication is based was funded in part through the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Princeton, WV. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Princeton, WV | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1930-2126 | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/97912 | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.rights | Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Rough mill lumber yield | en |
dc.subject | Cut-up systems | en |
dc.subject | Rip-first | en |
dc.subject | Crosscut-first | en |
dc.subject | Performance | en |
dc.title | Potential for Yield Improvement in Combined Rip-First and Crosscut-First Rough Mill Processing | en |
dc.title.serial | Bioresources | en |
dc.type | Article - Refereed | en |
dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |
dc.type.dcmitype | StillImage | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- ThomasPotential.pdf
- Size:
- 361.3 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: