Ecological costs and benefits of defenses in nectar

dc.contributorVirginia Techen
dc.contributor.authorAdler, Lynn S.en
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, Rebecca E.en
dc.contributor.departmentBiological Sciencesen
dc.date.accessed2014-01-08en
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-10T20:07:55Zen
dc.date.available2014-01-10T20:07:55Zen
dc.date.issued2005-11en
dc.description.abstractThe nectar of many plant species contains defensive compounds that have been hypothesized to benefit plants through a variety of mechanisms. However, the relationship between nectar defenses and plant fitness has not been established for any species. We experimentally manipulated gelsemine, the principal alkaloid of Carolina jessamine (Gelsemium sempervirens), in nectar to determine its effect on pollinator visitation, nectar robber visitation, and male and female plant reproduction. We found that nectar robbers and most pollinators probed fewer flowers and spent less time per flower on plants with high compared to low nectar alkaloids. High alkaloids decreased the donation of fluorescent dye, an analogue of pollen used to estimate male plant reproduction, to neighboring plants by one-third to one-half. However, nectar alkaloids did not affect female plant reproduction, measured as pollen receipt, fruit set, seed set, and seed mass. The weak effects of nectar alkaloids on female reproduction could represent a balance between the altered behavior of nectar robbers and pollinators, or it could be that neither of these interactions affected plant reproduction. Taken together, these results suggest that secondary compounds in nectar may have more costs than benefits for plants.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationLynn S. Adler and Rebecca E. Irwin 2005. ECOLOGICAL COSTS AND BENEFITS OF DEFENSES IN NECTAR. Ecology 86:2968–2978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/05-0118en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1890/05-0118en
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/24797en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.esajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1890/05-0118en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectalkaloidsen
dc.subjectCarolina jessamineen
dc.subjectcosts and benefitsen
dc.subjectfemale plant fitnessen
dc.subjectgelsemineen
dc.subjectGelsemium sempervirensen
dc.subjectmale plant fitnessen
dc.subjectnectar defenseen
dc.subjectnectar robbingen
dc.subjectpollinationen
dc.subjectsecondary compoundsen
dc.subjecttoxic nectaren
dc.subjectgelsemium-sempervirens loganiaceaeen
dc.subjectipomopsis-aggregata polemoniaceaeen
dc.subjectwild radishen
dc.subjectadaptive significanceen
dc.subjectfloral variationen
dc.subjectseed productionen
dc.subjecttoxic nectaren
dc.subjectpollen flowen
dc.subjectplanten
dc.subjectherbivoryen
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecologyen
dc.titleEcological costs and benefits of defenses in nectaren
dc.title.serialEcologyen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
05-0118.pdf
Size:
217.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article