Statistical Science and Philosophy of Science: Where Do/Should They Meet in 2011 (and Beyond)?

dc.contributor.authorMayo, Deborah G.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-20T16:34:25Zen
dc.date.available2017-11-20T16:34:25Zen
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.description.abstractDebates over the philosophical foundations of statistics have a long and fascinating history; the decline of a lively exchange between philosophers of science and statisticians is relatively recent. Is there something special about 2011 (and beyond) that calls for renewed engagement in these fields? I say yes. There are some surprising, pressing, and intriguing new philosophical twists on the long-running controversies that cry out for philosophical analysis, and I hope to galvanize my co-contributors as well as the reader to take up the general cause.en
dc.description.notesSpecial Topic: Statistical Science and Philosophy of Science pp.79-102en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/80466en
dc.identifier.volume2en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRMMen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/en
dc.titleStatistical Science and Philosophy of Science: Where Do/Should They Meet in 2011 (and Beyond)?en
dc.title.serialRationality, Markets and Morals: Studies at the Intersection of Philosophy and Economicsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Article_Mayo.pdf
Size:
134.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: