VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 27, through Friday, November 29. We will resume normal operations on Monday, December 2. Thank you for your patience.
 

Development of supine and standing knee joint position sense tests

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorStrong, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, Divyaen
dc.contributor.authorHäger, Charlotte K.en
dc.contributor.departmentIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T12:47:02Zen
dc.date.available2021-07-29T12:47:02Zen
dc.date.issued2021-05en
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of a supine and standing knee joint position sense (JPS) test, respectively, and whether they discriminate knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury from asymptomatic knees. Design: Repeated measures and cross-sectional. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: For test-retest reliability, 24 persons with asymptomatic knees. For discriminative analysis: 1) ACLR -18 persons on average 23 months after unilateral ACL reconstruction, 2) CTRL - 23 less-active persons, and 3) ATHL - 21 activity level-matched athletes. Main outcome measures: Absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE). Results: Test-retest reliability was generally highest for AE of the standing test (ICC 0.64-0.91). Errors were less for the standing compared to the supine test across groups. CTRL had greater knee JPS AE (P = 0.005) and VE (P = 0.040) than ACLR. ACLR knees showed greater VE compared to the contralateral non-injured knees for both tests (P = 0.032), albeit with a small effect size (eta(2)(p) = 0.244). Conclusions: Our standing test was more reliable and elicited lesser errors than our supine test. Less-active controls, rather than ACLR, produced significantly greater errors. Activity level may be a more predominant factor than ACLR for knee JPS similar to 2 years post-reconstruction. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.description.notesThis work was supported by the Swedish Scientific Research Council (Grant No. 2017-00892), Region Vasterbotten County (Grant No. ALF VLL548501, VLL838421 and Strategic funding VLL-358901; Project No. 7002795), the Swedish Scientific Research Council for Sports Science (Grant No. Dnr CIF 2017/8 P2018-0104 and CIF P2019-0068), Umea School of Sport Science (Grant No. Dnr IH 5.3-13-2017) and King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria's Masonic Foundation. The funders did not have any role in study design and outcomes.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSwedish Scientific Research CouncilSwedish Research Council [2017-00892]; Region Vasterbotten County [ALF VLL548501, VLL838421, VLL-358901, 7002795]; Swedish Scientific Research Council for Sports Science [Dnr CIF 2017/8 P2018-0104, CIF P2019-0068]; Umea School of Sport Science [Dnr IH 5.3-13-2017]; King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria's Masonic Foundationen
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.02.010en
dc.identifier.issn1466-853Xen
dc.identifier.pmid33667776en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/104438en
dc.identifier.volume49en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectProprioceptionen
dc.subjectKneeen
dc.subjectAthletesen
dc.subjectReliabilityen
dc.titleDevelopment of supine and standing knee joint position sense testsen
dc.title.serialPhysical Therapy in Sporten
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1466853X21000389-main.pdf
Size:
1023.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Scholarly Works, Industrial and Systems Engineering