Assessing Factors Leading to Commercial Driver Seat Belt Non-Compliance

Abstract

The current research study utilized a literature review and analysis of two data sources to determine situational factors associated with reduced seat belt usage among CMV drivers. The literature review identified characteristics of seat belt use, reasons drivers may or may not use seat belts, methods to improve seat belt use rates, and important gaps in the literature. The data analysis used data collected in two separate studies to assess seat belt use rates and explore the relationship between seat belt use and environmental, roadway, vehicle, and driver factors. The first study collected observational data in 2015 from multiple sites in Michigan with high rates of truck/bus-involved crashes. The second study collected naturalistic driving data during the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s Advanced System Testing Utilizing a Data Acquisition System on Highways (FAST DASH) second Safety Technology Evaluation Project (commonly referred to as FAST DASH 2). The naturalistic driving data set included safety-critical events (SCEs), which were reduced for driver behaviors and environmental and roadway information. In the current study, driver seat belt use was observed in 93% of the FAST DASH 2 naturalistic driving SCEs and in 81% of SCEs in the observational data set. The analysis of observational and FAST DASH 2 naturalistic driving study data identified several factors where seat belt use patterns changed significantly across the factor levels; however, the analyses for each data set did not show consistency in statistical significance. The observational data showed seat belt use to be associated with day of week, time of day, road type, truck type, and fleet type. Little correlation was found between seat belt use and other driver behaviors. The analysis of observational study data did find seat belt use to be significantly higher in observations where drivers were using a hands-free cell phone with earpiece compared to drivers not using a cell phone or talking on a handheld cell phone. The naturalistic driving data showed that drivers operating on divided highways had higher seat belt use compared to those driving on non-physically divided roadways.