VTechWorks staff will be away for the Independence Day holiday from July 4-7. We will respond to email inquiries on Monday, July 8. Thank you for your patience.
 

Convict Leasing, Justifications, Critiques, and the Case for Reparations

dc.contributor.authorHowell, Courtneyen
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T19:45:50Zen
dc.date.available2019-06-18T19:45:50Zen
dc.date.issued2016-05-01en
dc.description.abstractThe first prisoner received by the State of Florida into the convict leasing system was an African-American man named Cy Williams. He was officially entered into prison records as "No. 1." rather than by his name. Williams did not know his own age upon arrival, but one prison official's memoir states that the boy had been convicted "when he was a mere pickaninny." Though not large enough to mount a horse, Williams nevertheless attempted to steal one and the authorities caught him while he was trying to lead it off by the halter. For his crime, a judge "duly sentenced" Williams to twenty years imprisonment. Malachi Martin, the warden of the work camp at the time, unsure at first how to put such a small prisoner to work, eventually came up with an idea. He placed a pile of two bricks at each of end of the prison yard while giving "the black baby" two more. The warden then ordered Williams to carry his two bricks to one of the piles at either end of the yard, place them on the ground, pick up the other two bricks, and carry them to the pile at the opposite end. He continued this process for the entire day, always carrying two bricks at a time. Martin instructed Williams to keep the piles of bricks neat and warned him not to break any of them. If he failed to keep his stack orderly, or if he damaged the bricks, he would be whipped. He continued this activity throughout his sentence and "grew up at the task" until given other labor assignments years later. Through the abrasion from simply picking the bricks up and setting them down, Williams managed to wear out four sets of bricks while carrying out his sentence. The state never considered commuting Williams' sentence, even after ten years of service as protocol dictated; the proper avenues for commutation were not in place at the camp because of inefficient leadership and poor organizational structures within the prison system. Eventually, however, Williams received "gain time" and only served seventeen years out of his twenty-year sentence.en
dc.format.extent22 pagesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipen
dc.identifier.citationCourtney Howell, Convict Leasing, Virginia Tech Undergraduate Historical Review 5 (2016), 56-77en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21061/vtuhr.v5i1.41en
dc.identifier.eissn2165-9915en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/90251en
dc.identifier.volume5en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Tech Department of Historyen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderVirginia Tech Department of History, Authors retain rights to individual worksen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectHistoryen
dc.titleConvict Leasing, Justifications, Critiques, and the Case for Reparationsen
dc.title.serialVirginia Tech Undergraduate Historical Reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vtuhr-v5-howell.pdf
Size:
982.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Name:
vtuhr-v5-howell.zip
Size:
210.65 KB
Format: