The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor

dc.contributor.authorVerhulst, N.en
dc.contributor.authorGovaerts, Bramen
dc.contributor.authorNelissen, V.en
dc.contributor.authorSayre, Ken D.en
dc.contributor.authorCrossa, J.en
dc.contributor.authorRaes, D.en
dc.contributor.authorDeckers, Jozefen
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.coverage.spatialEl Batánen
dc.coverage.spatialMexicoen
dc.coverage.temporal2004 - 2008en
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T20:29:17Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T20:29:17Zen
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractCrop growth and development as well as yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. End-of-season yield results do not permit the evaluation of within-season management interactions with the production environment and do not allow for full understanding of the management practice applied. Crop growth and development were measured during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 crop cycles with an optical handheld NDVI sensor for all plots of the different management treatments of a long-term (since 1991) sustainability trial in the highlands of Mexico. Cropping systems varying in (1) tillage (conventional vs. zero tillage); (2) residue management (retention vs. removal); (3) rotation (monocropping vs. a maize [Zea mays L.]/wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] rotation) were compared. The NDVI-handheld sensor was evaluated as a tool to monitor crop growth and development and was found to be an excellent tool for this purpose. There was a strong relation between NDVI and biomass accumulation of maize and wheat. The measurement with the handheld sensor was non-destructive and fast so that a representative plot area could be measured easily and time-efficiently. Zero tillage induced different crop growth dynamics over time compared to conventional tillage. Zero tillage with residue retention is characterized by a slower initial crop growth, compensated for by an increased growth in the later stages, positively influencing final grain yield. Also crop rotation influenced early crop growth, with lower NDVI values for crops sown after wheat than crops after maize. Zero tillage with residue removal had low NDVI values throughout the growing season. Zero tillage with retention of crop residues results in time efficient use of resources, as opposed to conventional tillage, regardless of residue management, and zero tillage with residue removal. The results indicated that different tillage, rotation and residue management practices influence crop growth and development. It is important to monitor and understand crop growth under different management systems to select the right varieties and adjust timing and practice of input supply (fertilizer, irrigation etc.) in a holistic way in each cropping system. (CAB Abstract)en
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.identifier5228en
dc.identifier.citationField Crops Research 120(1): 58-67en
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/69905en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectRainfed agricultureen
dc.subjectSoil conservationen
dc.subjectConservation agricultureen
dc.subjectSemiarid zonesen
dc.subjectEcoagricultureen
dc.subjectCrop rotationsen
dc.subjectZero tillageen
dc.subjectNdvi hand-held sensoren
dc.subjectResidue managementen
dc.subjectCrop growthen
dc.subjectZea mays l.en
dc.subjectTriticum aestivumen
dc.subjectField Scaleen
dc.titleThe effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensoren
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files