Land reform: Still a goal worth pursuing for rural women?

dc.contributor.authorJacobs, S.en
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T19:30:46Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T19:30:46Zen
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractThis paper asks if considering all the changes happening in development are still worth talking about in reference to land reform and women. The article presents arguments to confirm that because women have been excluded from land reforms and redistribution, they had to diversify their livelihood bases. Many countries still practice customary patrilineal law which is highly discriminatory towards women, and often excludes widowed and divorced women with dependents. Women have no control over land, and only married women have access to land. Outside pressures for increase income can decrease time and investment in agriculture. Often husbands control wives' incomes too. The article also argues that land reform which includes women would benefit not only women, but it would increase food security, would allow wives to keep better control over their own incomes, and would increase women's status more generally.en
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.identifier3164en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International Development 14: 887-898en
dc.identifier.issn0954-1748en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/67313en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectWomenen
dc.subjectLivelihoodsen
dc.subjectIncome generationen
dc.subjectWomen excludeden
dc.subjectLand reformen
dc.titleLand reform: Still a goal worth pursuing for rural women?en
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files