Effectiveness of temporary stream crossing closure techniques. Forest operations research highlights

dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Scott M.en
dc.contributor.authorAust, W. Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorBolding, M. Chaden
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen
dc.coverage.stateVirginiaen
dc.date.accessed2019-12en
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T22:48:23Zen
dc.date.available2020-01-09T22:48:23Zen
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.description.abstractSlash was the most cost effective of the treatments. When slash is applied as a part of the harvesting operation it can be effective at reducing sediment and is the most cost effective treatmenten
dc.description.notesVT/0814/ANR-110NPen
dc.format.extent4 pagesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/96367en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/ANR/ANR-110/ANR-110-PDF.pdfen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherVirginia Cooperative Extensionen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPublication (Virginia Cooperative Extension) ; ANR-110en
dc.rightsVirginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.en
dc.subject.cabtWater qualityen
dc.subject.cabtsedimenten
dc.titleEffectiveness of temporary stream crossing closure techniques. Forest operations research highlightsen
dc.typeExtension publicationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ANR-110.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format