Do sustainable livelihood approaches have a positive impact on the rural poor? A look at twelve case studies

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNeely, Constance L.en
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, K.en
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, J.en
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T19:11:25Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T19:11:25Zen
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines case studies of projects that employed a sustainable livelihoods approach or sustainable livelihoods principles and in which there were measurable effects of poverty reduction. The paper is not a comparative study between livelihoods and non-livelihoods approaches and as such, "traditional" development cases were not considered. This paper also attempts to identify the operational and institutional elements that were consistent among cases of successful impact on the rural poor.en
dc.description.notesAvailable in SANREM office, FSen
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.identifier2014en
dc.identifier.citationFAO Livelihood Support Programme (LSP) Working Paper 16en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/66600en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.uriftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/j5129e/j5129e00.pdfen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.fao.org/sd/dim_pe4/pe4_050903_en.htmen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectRural developmenten
dc.subjectSocial capitalen
dc.subjectLivelihoodsen
dc.subjectGovernment institutionsen
dc.subjectPovertyen
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.subjectInstitutional changeen
dc.subjectCase studiesen
dc.subjectEcosystem Farm/Enterprise Scale Field Scaleen
dc.titleDo sustainable livelihood approaches have a positive impact on the rural poor? A look at twelve case studiesen
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Collections

Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase