VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 27, through Friday, November 29. We will resume normal operations on Monday, December 2. Thank you for your patience.
 

Effects of Landscape Characteristics on Annual Survival of Lesser Prairie-Chickens

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Samantha G.en
dc.contributor.authorHaukos, David A.en
dc.contributor.authorPlumb, Reid T.en
dc.contributor.authorKraft, John D.en
dc.contributor.authorSullins, Daniel S.en
dc.contributor.authorLautenbach, Joseph M.en
dc.contributor.authorLautenbach, Jonathan D.en
dc.contributor.authorSandercock, Brett K.en
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Christian A.en
dc.contributor.authorBartuszevige, Anneen
dc.contributor.authorRice, Mindy A.en
dc.contributor.departmentFish and Wildlife Conservationen
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T12:28:27Zen
dc.date.available2020-07-09T12:28:27Zen
dc.date.issued2018-07en
dc.description.abstractAgriculture and development have caused landscape change throughout the southwestern Great Plains in the range of the lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus). Landscape alteration within the lesser prairie-chicken range may contribute to range contraction and population losses through decreases in survival rates. Our objectives were to determine if: (1) landscape configuration (i.e., the spatial arrangement of habitat) or composition (i.e., the amount of habitat), at the study.site scale, affected annual survival of females, (2) relationships exist between landscape context (i.e., landscape configuration and composition) and weekly survival to assess effects of landscape composition and configuration on lesser prairie-chicken populations, and (3) anthropogenic features influenced daily mortality risk. We captured 170 female lesser prairie-chickens and used very-high-frequency and GPS (Global Positioning System) transmitters to track their movement and survival for 2 y. We used known-fate survival models to test if landscape configuration or composition within three sites in Kansas were related to differences in female survival among sites. In addition we tested for relationships between weekly survival and landscape configuration or composition within home ranges. Finally, we used Andersen-Gill models to test the influence of distance to anthropogenic features on daily mortality risk. Differences in survival were evident between sites with differing landscape compositions as annual survival in Northwestern Kansas (S=0.27) was half that of Clark County, Kansas (S=0.56), which corresponded with 41.9% more grassland on the landscape in Clark County; landscape configuration did not measurably differ among sites. Survival was greater for prairie-chickens with home-ranges that had greater patch richness and in areas with 30% crop and 57% grassland. Female lesser prairie-chickens also experienced greater mortality risk closer to fences at patch edges. Further conversion of grassland landscapes occupied by lesser prairie-chickens should be avoided to reduce habitat loss and fragmentation thresholds that could affect survival. We suggest continued encouragement of Conservation Reserve Program enrollment in western areas of the lesser prairie-chicken range to maintain or increase the amount of grassland to increase annual survival.en
dc.description.adminPublic domain – authored by a U.S. government employeeen
dc.description.notesWethank J. Pitman, K. Sexton, J. Kramer, M. Mitchener, D. Dahlgren, J. Prendergast, C. Berens, G. Kramos, A. Flanders, and S. Hyberg for their assistance with the project. Research was funded by the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Grant W-73-R; US Geological Survey; US Dept ofAgriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiative; Kansas Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism (Federal Assistance Grant KS W-73-R-3); USDA Farm Services CRP Monitoring, Assessment, and Evaluation (12-IA-MRE CRP TA#7, KSCFWRU RWO 62). We also thank two anonymous reviewers for reviewing earlier versions of this manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Grant [W-73-R]; US Geological SurveyUnited States Geological Survey; US Dept ofAgriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiative; Kansas Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism [KS W-73-R-3]; USDA Farm Services CRP Monitoring, Assessment, and Evaluation [7, KSCFWRU RWO 62]en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-180.1.66en
dc.identifier.eissn1938-4238en
dc.identifier.issn0003-0031en
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/99314en
dc.identifier.volume180en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.titleEffects of Landscape Characteristics on Annual Survival of Lesser Prairie-Chickensen
dc.title.serialAmerican Midland Naturalisten
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0003-0031-180.1.66.pdf
Size:
651.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Scholarly Works, Fish and Wildlife Conservation