Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorQuinlan, Braiden A.en
dc.contributor.authorRosenberger, Jacalyn P.en
dc.contributor.authorKalb, David M.en
dc.contributor.authorAbernathy, Heather N.en
dc.contributor.authorThorne, Emily D.en
dc.contributor.authorFord, W. Marken
dc.contributor.authorCherry, Michael J.en
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen
dc.coverage.stateVirginiaen
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-09T13:44:46Zen
dc.date.available2023-06-09T13:44:46Zen
dc.date.issued2022-12-05en
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding spatiotemporal variation in habitat quality is essential for guiding wildlife reintroduction and restoration programs. The habitat productivity hypothesis posits that home range size is inversely related to habitat quality. Thus, home range size may be used as a proxy for habitat quality and can identify important land cover features for a recovering species. We sought to quantify variation in home range size across the biological cycle (seasons) for a reintroduced elk (Cervus canadensis) population in southwestern Virginia, USA and quantify habitat quality by linking home range sizes to the land cover types they contain using linear mixed-effects models. We found mean home range size was largest during late gestation for female elk. Additionally, throughout the year, smaller home ranges were associated with larger proportions of non-forested habitats whereas forested habitats were generally the opposite. However, both presumed poor- and high-quality habitats influenced female elk space use. Our approach revealed spatial variation in habitat quality for a recovering elk herd, demonstrated the importance of non-forested habitats to elk, can guide decisions regarding the location of future elk reintroduction programs, and serve as a model for evaluating habitat quality associated with wildlife reintroductions.en
dc.description.adminPublic domain – authored by a U.S. government employeeen
dc.description.notesFunding for this project was provided by the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources to Virginia Tech using Wildlife Restoration funds (award F18AF00664) provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Wildlife and Sportfish Restoration Program.en
dc.description.sponsorshipVirginia Department of Wildlife Resources [F18AF00664]; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Wildlife and Sportfish Restoration Programen
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25058-9en
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322en
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.identifier.pmid36470959en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/115392en
dc.identifier.volume12en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNature Portfolioen
dc.rightsPublic Domain (U.S.)en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/en
dc.subjecthome-range sizeen
dc.subjectresource selectionen
dc.subjectcervus-elaphusen
dc.subjectmule deeren
dc.subjectforaging patternsen
dc.subjectdiet compositionen
dc.subjectbody-sizeen
dc.subjectmovementsen
dc.subjectrestorationen
dc.subjectseasonen
dc.titleDrivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herden
dc.title.serialScientific Reportsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s41598-022-25058-9.pdf
Size:
5.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Scholarly Works, Fish and Wildlife Conservation