VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation

dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Arunen
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Clark C.en
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T18:08:55Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T18:08:55Zen
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractThe poor conservation outcomes that followed decades of intrusive resource management strategies and planned development have forced policy makers and scholars to reconsider the role of community in resource use and conservation. In a break from previous work on development which considered communities a hindrance to progressive social change, current writings champion the role of community in bringing about decentralization, meaningful participation, and conservation. But despite its recent popularity, the concept of community is rarely defined or carefully examined by those concerned with resource use and management. We seek to redress this omission by investigating "community" in work concerning resource conservation and management. We explore the conceptual origins of the community, and the ways the term has been deployed in writings on resource use. We then analyze those aspects of community most important to advocates for community's role in resource management - community as a small spatial unit, as a homogeneous social structure, and as shared norms - and indicate the weaknesses of these approaches. Finally, we suggest a more political approach: community must be examined in the context of development and conservation by focusing on the multiple interests and actors within communities, on how these actors influence decision-making, and on the internal and external institutions that shape the decision-making process. A focus on institutions rather than "community" is likely to be more fruitful for those interested in community-based natural resource management. (Cab Abstract)en
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.identifier521en
dc.identifier.citationWorld Development 27(4): 629-649en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2en
dc.identifier.issn0305-750Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/65578en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderCopyright 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectNatural resource managementen
dc.subjectCommunity institutionsen
dc.subjectConservationen
dc.subjectCommunity participationen
dc.subjectResource managementen
dc.subjectCommunityen
dc.subjectFarm/Enterprise Scale Governanceen
dc.titleEnchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservationen
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files