The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments
dc.contributor.author | Ferraro, Paul J. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Simpson, R. David | en |
dc.contributor.department | Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase | en |
dc.coverage.spatial | Madagascar | en |
dc.coverage.temporal | 1991 - 1995 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-19T18:56:30Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-19T18:56:30Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en |
dc.description.abstract | International donors invest billions of dollars to conserve ecosystems in low-income nations. The most common investments aim to encourage commercial activities, such as ecotourism, that indirectly generate ecosystem protection as a joint product. We demonstrate that paying for ecosystem protection directly can be far more cost-effective. Although direct-payment initiatives have imposing institutional requirements, we argue that all conservation initiatives face similar challenges. Thus conservation practitioners would be well advised to implement the first-best direct-payment approach, rather than a second-best policy option. An empirical example illustrates the spectacular cost savings that can be realized by direct-payment initiatives. | en |
dc.description.notes | PES-1 (Payments for Environmental Services Associate Award) | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | en |
dc.identifier | 676 | en |
dc.identifier | 2486 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Land Economics 78(3): 339-353 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0023-7639 | en |
dc.identifier.other | 676_CR_00011.pdf | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/66217 | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press | en |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.cserge.ucl.ac.uk/Ferraro%20and%20Simpson%202002.pdf | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2002 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Social impacts | en |
dc.subject | Humid zones | en |
dc.subject | Ecosystem | en |
dc.subject | Semiarid zones | en |
dc.subject | Sustainable development | en |
dc.subject | Payments for environmental services | en |
dc.subject | Environmental impacts | en |
dc.subject | Enterprise types | en |
dc.subject | Ecotourism | en |
dc.subject | Natural resource-based enterprise | en |
dc.subject | Conservation strategy | en |
dc.subject | Conservation | en |
dc.subject | Economic impacts | en |
dc.subject | Parks | en |
dc.subject | Natural resource management | en |
dc.subject | Low-income nations | en |
dc.subject | Direct payments | en |
dc.subject | Cost savings | en |
dc.subject | Ecosystem Farm/Enterprise Scale Governance | en |
dc.title | The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments | en |
dc.type | Article - Refereed | en |
dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1