Why a policy of federal management and protection of ecosystems is a bad idea

dc.contributor.authorFitzsimmons, A. K.en
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T19:10:27Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T19:10:27Zen
dc.date.issued1998en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractGovernment management and protection of ecosystems is often hailed as being a scientifically sound new approach to natural resource management. Little thought, however, has been given to the infirmities of the ecosystem concept when it is moved from the realm of research to that of public policy. This paper argues that government management and protection of ecosystems does not provide a rationale basis for land management policies. The arbitrary and capricious geographic nature of ecosystems makes them ill-suited to serve a spatial guides for governance while the goals of ecosystem management are nebulous at best. Policies of federal management and protection of ecosystems as entities on the landscape will inevitably lead to increased restrictions on the use of land and natural resources and to additional regulatory burdens.en
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.identifier1684en
dc.identifier.citationLandscape and Urban Planning 40(1-3): 195-202en
dc.identifier.issn0169-2046en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/66282en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherAmsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderCopyright 1998 by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectEcosystem managementen
dc.subjectNatural resource managementen
dc.subjectEcosystemen
dc.subjectConservationen
dc.subjectLand use managementen
dc.subjectPublic policyen
dc.subjectSound scienceen
dc.subjectEcosystemen
dc.titleWhy a policy of federal management and protection of ecosystems is a bad ideaen
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files