Evaluation of household water quality in Dinwiddie and Prince George Counties, Virginia

Simple item page
dc.contributorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
dc.contributorDepartment of Biological Systems Engineeringen
dc.contributorVirginia Cooperative Extensionen
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Burton Blakeen
dc.contributor.authorParrish, Michael J.en
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, W. W.en
dc.contributor.authorParrott, Kathleen R.en
dc.contributor.authorBourne, Amanda C.en
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen
dc.coverage.countyDinwiddie Countyen
dc.coverage.countyPrince George Countyen
dc.coverage.stateVirginiaen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-30T16:38:36Zen
dc.date.available2013-07-30T16:38:36Zen
dc.date.issued1999-12en
dc.description.abstractDuring Fall 1998 in Dinwiddie and Prince George Counties, Virginia, programs of household water quality education, which included water sampling, testing, and diagnosis, were conducted. Participation in the water quality programs was made available to any resident of these two counties who utilized a private, individual water supply. During the course of the projects, 520 households submitted water samples which were analyzed for iron, manganese, hardness, sulfate, chloride, fluoride, total dissolved solids, pH, saturation index, copper, sodium, nitrate, and total coliform and E. coli bacteria. These analyses identified the major household water quality problems in these two counties as iron/manganese, corrosivity, and bacteria. Additionally, a number of samples were determined to have concentrations of nitrate high enough to possibly lead to health complications for at-risk segments of the population. After the completion of the general water testing program, water supplies from 27 households were resampled for the testing of 25 pesticides and other chemical compounds. Only one of the samples had a concentration of any of these contaminants exceeding EPA Health Advisory of Maximum Contaminant Levels. Furthermore, a total of only seven detections were observed in four separate samples. Following completion of the programs, a survey was mailed to the 520 participants. One hundred and eighty-four participants returned survey forms on which they identified their reason(s) for participating in such a program; the primary reason was concern about safety of their water supply. Returned survey forms also provided insight into measures participants had already taken, or planned to take, to improve the quality of their water supply. Four-fifths of the households who reported having at least one water quality problem had taken, or planned to take, at least one measure to improve the quality of their water supply. Ten percent or more of all participants had taken, or planned to take, one or more of the following actions: shock chlorinate the water system, purchase or rent water treatment equipment, and use bottled water for drinking/cooking.en
dc.format.extentvi, 34 pagesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/23551en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherVirginia Cooperative Extensionen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPublication (Virginia Cooperative Extension) ; 442-930en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHousehold water quality series ; 40en
dc.rightsVirginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.A522 A345en
dc.subject.lcshWater quality -- Virginia -- Dinwiddie Countyen
dc.subject.lcshWater quality -- Virginia -- Prince George Countyen
dc.titleEvaluation of household water quality in Dinwiddie and Prince George Counties, Virginiaen
dc.typeExtension publicationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VCE442_930_1999.pdf
Size:
2.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Publications, Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE)