Participatory soil survey: Experience in working with a Mesoamerican indigenous community

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBarrera-Bassols, N.en
dc.contributor.authorZinck, J. A.en
dc.contributor.authorvan Ranst, E.en
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.coverage.spatialMexicoen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T20:29:26Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T20:29:26Zen
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses a participatory approach to integrating scientific soil surveys and local soil surveys in designing conservation plans. The objective of this study was to collaborate with a local community to design a participatory resource soil map in the Purhepecha community of San Francisco Pichataro. The goal of the research was to understand local knowledge, beliefs, perceptions and management practices in soil, relating this knowledge to scientific soil maps. Methods used were a literature review of participatory soil survey studies. Methods for field research included ethnopedology and ethnographic research techniques, including a participatory soil survey, interviews, triad tests, soil questionnaire, soil profile descriptions, soil correlation monoliths, soil-landscape cross-sections, and resource mapping. Twenty-seven farmers (six were women) were interviewed. Results show that Pichartaro farmers have five central soil types: hard and sticky, powdery, clayey, and gravelly. Farmers described and classified soils based on color, texture, landscape position, stoniness,and organic matter concentration. When making soil taxonomies, farmers put all soils with other human and nonhuman beings, and then break them into the five major types and so forth. Results also show that farmers pass local soil knowledge through generations with community meetings, land management laws, and experience. Using GIS mapping, it was concluded that local farmers and scientists make very similar soil maps, which are based on soil and landscape (terrain) connections. However, local farmers also conceptualize soil and land properties based on land ownership, sense of place, and identity. From this collaboration, farmers and soil scientists were able to make a community-based land-use plan.en
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.identifier5445en
dc.identifier.citationSoil Use and Management 25(1): 43-56en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/69937en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBritish Society of Soil Scienceen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 The Authors.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectStakeholdersen
dc.subjectHumid zonesen
dc.subjectEthnicity/raceen
dc.subjectCultureen
dc.subjectIndigenous communityen
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen
dc.subjectAgenciesen
dc.subjectConservation planningen
dc.subjectConservationen
dc.subjectCommunity participationen
dc.subjectLocal knowledgeen
dc.subjectAgricultural ecosystemsen
dc.subjectCommunity developmenten
dc.subjectCollective actionen
dc.subjectLocal soil knowledgeen
dc.subjectMexicoen
dc.subjectIndigenousen
dc.subjectParticipatoryen
dc.subjectSoil scienceen
dc.subjectFarm/Enterprise Scale Field Scaleen
dc.titleParticipatory soil survey: Experience in working with a Mesoamerican indigenous communityen
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Collections

Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase