Methods for determining streambank critical shear stress and soil erodibility: Implications for erosion rate predictions

dc.contributorVirginia Techen
dc.contributor.authorClark, L. Altynen
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Theresa M.en
dc.contributor.departmentBiological Systems Engineeringen
dc.date.accessed2014-05-29en
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-30T13:13:47Zen
dc.date.available2014-05-30T13:13:47Zen
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.description.abstractAccording to the U.S. EPA, excess sediment is a significant cause of water quality impairment for rivers. The goal of this study was to compare different methods of determining two parameters used to estimate streambank erosion, soil critical shear stress (tau(c)) and soil erodibility (k(d)) and to determine the impact of those differences on predictions of streambank erosion. At 25 field sites, bank erosion tests were conducted using a submerged jet test device, and soil samples were collected. Critical shear stress was measured using a multi-angle submerged jet test device (JT) and estimated based on Shields' diagram (SD) and empirical relations based on the soil parameters, percent clay (P-c), plasticity index (I-w), particle size (D-50) and percent silt-clay (SC). Additionally, using a single set of tau(c) values, the kd measured by the jet test was compared to predictions from two empirical k(d) relations. Using these parameter values, streambank erosion rates were predicted for a local stream. The jet tau(c) estimates were as much as four orders of magnitude greater than the SD, P, and D50 estimates, indicating the SD and empirical methods underestimate tau(c). The two empirical k(d) equations produced similar k(d) values that were generally two orders of magnitude less than the values from the jet test measurements. Erosion predictions followed the same trend as the k(d) data, with the jet test measurements resulting in higher predictions. Field validation of these methods over a wide range of soil types is recommended to develop methods of estimating k(d) and tau(c) for fine-grained streambank soils.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationClark, L. A.; Wynn, T. M., "Methods for determining streambank critical shear stress and soil erodibility: Implications for erosion rate predictions," Transactions of the ASABE. 50(1): 95-106. (doi: 10.13031/2013.22415) @2007en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22415en
dc.identifier.issn2151-0032en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/48200en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=22415&t=3&dabs=Y&redir=&redirType=en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineersen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectChannel erosionen
dc.subjectCritical shear stressen
dc.subjectErodibilityen
dc.subjectStreambank erosionen
dc.subjectStream restorationen
dc.subjectSouthwestern virginiaen
dc.subjectSurface erodibilityen
dc.subjectSubaerial processesen
dc.subjectEarthenen
dc.subjectChannelsen
dc.subjectDetachment rateen
dc.subjectVegetationen
dc.subjectStabilityen
dc.subjectDesignen
dc.subjectBanken
dc.subjectUSAen
dc.subjectAgricultureen
dc.titleMethods for determining streambank critical shear stress and soil erodibility: Implications for erosion rate predictionsen
dc.title.serialTransactions of the ASABEen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.typeConference proceedingen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SW6621.pdf
Size:
787.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article