Open Access Subvention Fund Articles

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/10919/71752
Works in this collection were funded by the Open Access Subvention Fund. See our guide for more about the OASF, including instructions on how to apply.

Browse

Browsing Open Access Subvention Fund Articles by Author "Acharya, Roshan"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship Program Directors’ Perspective on the Virtual Interview Process
    Acharya, Roshan; Peterson, Christopher J.; Foroozesh, Mahtab B. (American Thoracic Society, 2023-09)
    Background: Since the start of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the residency and fellowship recruitment process has changed significantly with the use of virtual interview (VI) platforms. Pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) candidates reported in a survey that VIs hindered their ability to evaluate their fit within the program. However, the program directors’ (PDs’) opinion of this process remains unknown. Objective: We aim to provide insight into the PCCM fellowship PDs’ perspective regarding the virtual recruitment process since the first class of fellows undergoing this process has now completed 1 year of training. Methods: An anonymous survey was sent to the PDs of PCCM programs participating in the National Resident Matching Program match process in 2020 and 2021. The survey consisted of five sections and 26 closed-ended questions and was distributed via email using the SurveyMonkey platform. The survey was conducted for a total of 6 weeks. A follow-up email to nonrespondents was sent every week. The collected responses were divided into two categories: favoring VIs versus not favoring VIs.A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with favoring VIs. Results: The survey was sent to 190 email accounts from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System website. Over the course of 6 weeks, 64 respondents participated in the survey, with a response rate of 33.68%. Of 64 respondents, 56 (87.5%) fully completed the survey and 8 (12.5%) partially completed the survey. The final sample size was 59. Thirty-six (61.02%) of the PDs favored VIs for future recruitment, and 23 (38.98%) did not (P,0.001). Ninety-seven percent of PDs who favored VIs versus 72.73% of those who did not perceived the current fellows to fit well in the program (P= 0.007). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed a trend toward higher odds of favoring VIs if PDs believed they were able to represent the program well virtually (adjusted odds ratio, 6.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 – 61.58) and if they found that the current fellows fit the program well (adjusted odds ratio, 7.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–66.52); however, these results were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In this survey research, we found that the majority of the PCCM fellowship PDs favored a virtual process for future recruitment.