Browsing by Author "Neurauter, Luke"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Assessing Alternate Approaches for Conveying Automated Vehicle ‘Intentions’Basantis, Alexis; Miller, Marty; Doerzaph, Zachary R.; Neurauter, Luke (SAFE-D: Safety Through Disruption National University Transportation Center, 2020-05)One of the biggest highly automated vehicle (HAV) market barriers may be a lack of user trust in the automated driving system itself. Research has shown that this lack of faith in the system primarily stems from a lack of system transparency while the vehicle is in motion—users are not informed how the car will react in an upcoming scenario—and not having an effective way to control the vehicle in the event of a system failure. This problem is particularly prevalent in public transit or ridesharing applications, where HAVs are expected to first appear and where the user has less training on and control over the vehicle. To improve user trust and perceptions of comfort and safety, this study evaluated human-machine interface (HMI) systems, focused on visual and auditory displays, to better relay the perceived driving environment and the automated vehicle “intentions” to the user. These HMI systems were then implemented into a HAV developed at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute and tested with volunteer participants on the Smart Roads.
- Click: Rideshare Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS): Seat Belt Use and MisuseMiller, Marty; Neurauter, Luke; Radlbeck, Joshua; McLaine, Joe (National Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellence, 2024-06-14)This report investigates rear passenger seat belt use and misuse within the rideshare environment. This research employed a naturalistic driving study (NDS) approach by instrumenting rideshare vehicles with video recording equipment, yielding insights into seat belt usage patterns. Findings reveal that more than 64% of rideshare passengers did not attempt to use their seat belt, while only 25% of passengers were observed to consistently use their seat belt correctly. Although men and women exhibited similar seat belt usage rates, women were less likely to wear their seat belt correctly. Age and estimated body mass index (BMI) also appeared to influence observed seat belt usage. Children and adult seniors demonstrated the highest ideal usage rates. Passengers with higher BMI demonstrated lower seat belt usage on average. Seating position appeared to impact seat belt usage as well. Passengers in the third (furthest) row demonstrated lower overall seat belt usage compared to those seated in the second row. Notably, across the trips recorded, children and adolescents made up only a very small percentage of the overall passenger population (< 10%) within this rideshare environment. This study underscores the need for interventions to promote seat belt use in rideshare vehicles, potentially leveraging in-vehicle reminders. Addressing these challenges is crucial for enhancing occupant safety and mitigating injury risks in the rideshare context.
- A Data Driven Approach to the Development and Evaluation of Acoustic Electric Vehicle Alerting Systems for Vision Impaired PedestriansRoan, Michael J.; Beard, Michael; Neurauter, Luke; Miller, Marty (Safe-D National UTC, 2023-02)The number of electric vehicles on the road increases exponentially every year. Due to the quieter nature of these vehicles when operating at low speeds, there is significant concern that pedestrians and bicyclists will be at increased risk of vehicle collisions. This research explores the detectability of six electric vehicle acoustic additive sounds produced by two sound dispersion techniques: (1) using the factory approach versus (2) an exciter transducer-based system. Detectability was initially measured using on-road participant tests and was then replicated in a high-fidelity immersive reality lab. Results were analyzed through both mean detection distances and pedestrian probability of detection. This research aims to verify the lab environment in order to allow for a broader range of potential test scenarios, more repeatable tests, and faster test sessions. Along with pedestrian drive-by tests, supplemental experiments were conducted to evaluate stationary vehicle acoustics, 10 and 20 km/h drive by acoustics, and interior acoustics of each additive sound.
- Exploratory Development of Algorithms for Determining Driver Attention StatusHerbers, Eileen; Miller, Marty; Neurauter, Luke; Walters, Jacob; Glaser, Daniel (SAGE, 2023-09)Objective: Varying driver distraction algorithms were developed using vehicle kinematics and driver gaze data obtained from a camera-based driver monitoring system (DMS). Background: Distracted driving characteristics can be difficult to accurately detect due to wide variation in driver behavior across driving environments. The growing availability of information about drivers and their involvement in the driving task increases the opportunity for accurately recognizing attention state. Method: A baseline for driver distraction levels was developed using a video feed of 24 separate drivers in varying naturalistic driving conditions. This initial assessment was used to develop four buffer-based algorithms that aimed to determine a driver's real-time attentiveness, via a variety of metrics and combinations thereof. Results: Of those tested, the optimal algorithm included ungrouped glance locations and speed. Notably, as an algorithm's performance of detecting very distracted drivers improved, its accuracy for correctly identifying attentive drivers decreased. Conclusion: At a minimum, drivers' gaze position and vehicle speed should be included when designing driver distraction algorithms to delineate between glance patterns observed at high and low speeds. Distraction algorithms should be designed with an understanding of their limitations, including instances in which they may fail to detect distracted drivers, or falsely notify attentive drivers. Application: This research adds to the body of knowledge related to driver distraction and contributes to available methods to potentially address and reduce occurrences. Machine learning algorithms can build on the data elements discussed to increase distraction detection accuracy using robust artificial intelligence.
- Improving Methods to Measure Attentiveness through Driver MonitoringMiller, Marty; Herbers, Eileen; Walters, Jacob; Neurauter, Luke (SAFE-D: Safety Through Disruption National University Transportation Center, 2022-07)Driver inattention poses a significant problem on today’s roadways, increasing risk for all road users. This report details our efforts in developing algorithms to detect driver inattention. A benchmark dataset was developed based on video review of driving events. Buffer-based algorithms were developed and compared using this benchmark dataset. The benchmark events were also used as a training dataset for machine learning models. Driver glance locations were important for determining driver attentiveness. In addition, vehicle speed was important for understanding the driving context, which was found to have a large impact on driver behavior.
- Pediatric Vehicular Heatstroke: Evaluation of Preventative TechnologiesGlenn, T. Laurel; Glenn, Eric; Neurauter, Luke (National Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellence, 2021-04-06)In 2018 and 2019, pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH) was the leading cause of nontraffic child fatalities involving vehicles in the United States. Legislation is being introduced in Congress to require passenger vehicles to be equipped with rear seat reminder technologies (RSRTs), which would help to mitigate against PVH. In a previous study, the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI) conducted an extensive literature review to better understand the circumstances under which PVH occurs, identify the available preventive technologies, and examine what is necessary for an optimized PVH-prevention solution. The current study builds on that work by conducting a functional evaluation of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and aftermarket RSRT implementations, focusing on occupant detection methods and driver/bystander notification approaches. Using scenarios based on real-world PVH cases, this effort was a hands-on evaluation of how each RSRT implementation performed, accounting for OEM and select aftermarket RSRTs available at the time of data collection. Each implementation received ratings for reliability and effectiveness, offering opportunities to examine and discuss specific RSRT advantages and shortcomings.
- Probability of detection of electric vehicles with and without added warning soundsRoan, Michael J.; Neurauter, Luke; Song, Miao; Miller, Marty (Acoustic Society of America, 2021-01-26)Detection performance as a function of distance was measured for 16 subjects who pressed a button upon aurally detecting the approach of an electric vehicle. The vehicle was equipped with loudspeakers that broadcast one of four additive warning sounds. Other test conditions included two vehicle approach speeds [10 and 20 km/h (kph)] and two background noise conditions (55 and 60 dBA). All of the test warning sounds were designed to be compliant with FMVSS 141 proposed regulations in regard to the overall sound pressure levels around the vehicle and in 1/3 octave band levels. Previous work has provided detection results as average vehicle detection distance. This work provides the results as probability of detection (Pd) as a function of distance. The curves provide insight into the false alarm rate when the vehicle is far away from the listeners as well and the Pd at the mean detection distance. Results suggest that, although the test sounds provide an average detection distance that exceeds the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration minimum at the two test speeds, Pd is not always 100% at those distances, particularly at the 10 kph. At the higher speed of 20 kph, the tire-road interaction noise becomes dominant, and the detection range is greatly extended.
- Quiet Car Detectability: Impact of Artificial Noise on Ability of Pedestrians to Safely Detect Approaching Electric VehiclesNeurauter, Luke; Roan, Michael J.; Song, Miao; Miller, Marty; Glenn, Eric; Walters, Jacob (National Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellence, 2020-04-10)Many auto manufacturers are now producing hybrid and electric vehicles with an additive noise component to signal vehicle presence in the same way that internal combustion engine vehicles signal their presence through engine noise. The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute conducted an evaluation of quiet car detectability as part of a GM-funded project in 2015–2016. The internal combustion engine benchmark significantly outperformed the other three vehicles under a 10-km/h steady approach, but these differences largely disappeared at 20 km/h due to increased tire and road noise. Trends of improved detectability offered by the additive noise signals were observed but did not demonstrate a significant advantage over an electric vehicle with no additional noise component. Since that original project, NHTSA has released their final version of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141, outlining “Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles.” This project aimed to demonstrate differences in detectability by replicating the previous study but with newer FMVSS 141-compliant sounds. The proposed additive sounds examined drastically improved detectability compared to the production variants included in the first round of testing. At 10 km/h, the additive sound conditions outperformed the no-sound condition by magnitudes ranging from 3.4 to 4.6, each eliciting mean detection distances well above the NHTSA minimum detection criteria. At 20 km/h, detectability also improved dramatically over the earlier production variants, achieving a similar magnitude advantage over no-sound as observed at 10 km/h. Increasing background noise resulted in a measurable impact on mean detection distances. The average reduction across all conditions was approximately 33% and 28% for approach speeds of 10 km/h and 20 km/h, respectively. In terms of accurately recognizing a stopped vehicle in a 20 to 0 km/h scenario, all sound conditions significantly outperformed the no-sound condition across both background noise conditions.
- Standardized Performance Evaluation of Vehicles with Automated CapabilitiesBasantis, Alexis; Harwood, Leslie C.; Doerzaph, Zachary R.; Neurauter, Luke (SAFE-D: Safety Through Disruption National University Transportation Center, 2019-12)Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are becoming widely available in the new vehicle landscape, increasing of both vehicle occupants’ and other road users’ safety. In some vehicles, longitudinal and lateral positioning under certain conditions can be maintained, designating them as having either SAE level 1 (L1) or level 2 (L2) automated features. By developing a standardized set of tests to be applied to current L1 and L2 vehicles, while keeping the future advancement of automation in mind, these vehicles’ system performance, feature limitations, and performance consistency can be systematically evaluated. This project sought to develop an easily implementable, standardized set of testing procedures that could be quickly and inexpensively performed on automated vehicles to characterize their feature capabilities and limitations. Such information is useful to private or public organizations interested in a standardized approach to classifying vehicle capabilities, whether for informing the expectation of operators, or for cataloging and learning from the variety of implementation alternatives. Although not the primary purpose, this project may also help inform efforts to develop certification or other standardized vehicle performance efforts. The results of this project showed that specific roadway factors affected automated feature performance and that there was significant performance variability across test vehicles.