Browsing by Author "Word, Clayton S."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Assessing Flow-driven Effects on Local and Downstream Water Quality in Central Appalachian Headwater Streams Influenced by Surface Coal Mining
    Schoenholtz, Stephen H.; McLaughlin, Daniel L.; Entrekin, Sally A.; Hotchkiss, Erin R.; Timpano, Anthony J.; Cianciolo, Thomas R.; Word, Clayton S. (Virginia Tech. Powell River Project, 2020-10)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Hydrologic-based modelling of burn depth potentials in degraded peat soils
    Link, Nicholas T.; McLaughlin, Daniel L.; Stewart, Ryan D.; Strahm, Brian D.; Varner, J. Morgan; Word, Clayton S.; Wurster, Frederic C. (Wiley, 2023-01)
    Peatland drainage may degrade system resilience to high intensity, soil-consuming fires. Peat soil fires are unique in that they can smoulder vertically through the soil column, with a multitude of consequences including large carbon emissions, altered hydrology, and dramatic shifts in vegetation communities. In this work we developed and verified a new method to model peat burn depths with readily available water level and peat hydraulic property data at the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (VA and NC, USA). To model peat burn depths across 11 sites in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge we combined water table time series data and soil moisture release curves, developed at multiple depths, with moisture-to-ignition thresholds. A subset of the results from this empirical modelling approach of peat burn depth severity were compared against those made using a mechanistic model of soil moisture, HYDRUS 1-D. By comparing modelled burn depth potentials between these two approaches for a range of peats, we confirmed that our simpler, water table-based approach had similar performance to HYDRUS 1-D in drained and degraded peats, like those found in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge. A comparative analysis of modelled burn depths across our study site found that water table position and peat water holding capacity were the key governing controls on burn depth potential. Our findings suggest that drainage weakens both short- and long-term controls on peat burn depths by reducing soil moisture and by decreasing peat water holding capacity. This new approach offers land managers with an additional tool for assessing risk while offering insight into the drivers of peatland wildfire severity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Peatland drainage alters soil structure and water retention properties: Implications for ecosystem function and management
    Word, Clayton S.; McLaughlin, Daniel L.; Strahm, Brian D.; Stewart, Ryan D.; Varner, J. Morgan; Wurster, Frederic C.; Amestoy, Trevor J.; Link, Nicholas T. (Wiley, 2022-03)
    Peatland functions (e.g., carbon sequestration and flora diversity) are largely driven by soil moisture dynamics and thus dependent on interactions between hydrologic regimes and organic soil properties. Understanding these interactions is particularly important in drained peatlands, where drier conditions may alter soil properties with feedbacks to soil water retention and associated ecosystem functions. In this work, we focused on the Great Dismal Swamp (GDS) in Virginia, USA, a historically drained, temperate peatland with ongoing hydrologic restoration efforts. Two distinct soil layers varying in thickness exist at GDS: an upper layer with subangular blocky structure thought to be a result of past drainage, and a sapric lower layer with a massive structure more representative of an undisturbed state. To understand the occurrence and consequences of these distinct layers, we used continuous water table data and analysed soil physical and hydraulic properties to characterize soil profiles at 16 locations. We found significant differences between layer properties, where upper layers had lower fibre and organic matter contents and higher bulk densities. Further, moisture release curves demonstrated lower water retention in upper layers compared with lower layers and key differences in pore structure, with upper layers having higher macroporosity. Upper layers varied in thickness across sampling locations (similar to 0.30 to 1.0 m) with a transition to lower soil layers typically occurring at depths below contemporary water level observations, suggesting that the upper layer may be a result of historical drainage and deeper water table conditions. Yet, upper layers with more frequent saturation exhibited higher water retention and lower macroporosity compared with drier upper layers, thus indicating potential recovery following re-wetting efforts. These findings highlight how past drainage influences soil properties and water retention, with important implications for current management objectives at GDS and other drained peatland systems.