Center for Neutrino Physics

Permanent URI for this community

https://hdl.handle.net/10919/24464

Browse

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7

Comparison of the calorimetric and kinematic methods of neutrino energy reconstruction in disappearance experiments
Ankowski, Artur M.; Benhar, Omar; Coloma, Pilar; Huber, Patrick; Jen, C. M.; Mariani, Camillo; Meloni, David; Vagnoni, E. (American Physical Society, 2015-10-22)
To be able to achieve their physics goals, future neutrino-oscillation experiments will need to reconstruct the neutrino energy with very high accuracy. In this work, we analyze how the energy reconstruction may be affected by realistic detection capabilities, such as energy resolutions, efficiencies, and thresholds. This allows us to estimate how well the detector performance needs to be determined a priori in order to avoid a sizable bias in the measurement of the relevant oscillation parameters. We compare the kinematic and calorimetric methods of energy reconstruction in the context of two ν_μ &8594; ν_μ disappearance experiments operating in different energy regimes. For the calorimetric reconstruction method, we find that the detector performance has to be estimated with an Ο(10%) accuracy to avoid a significant bias in the extracted oscillation parameters. On the other hand, in the case of kinematic energy reconstruction, we observe that the results exhibit less sensitivity to an overestimation of the detector capabilities.
Direct measurement of backgrounds using reactor-off data in Double Chooz
Abe, Y.; Aberle, C.; dos Anjos, J. C.; Barriere, J. C.; Bergevin, M.; Bernstein, A.; Bezerra, T. J. C.; Bezrukhov, Leonid B.; Blucher, E.; Bowden, N. S.; Buck, C.; Busenitz, J.; Cabrera, A.; Caden, E.; Camilleri, Leslie; Carr, Rachel E.; Cerrada, M.; Chang, P. J.; Chimenti, P.; Classen, T.; Collin, A. P.; Conover, E.; Conrad, Janet M.; Crespo-Anadon, J. I.; Crum, K.; Cucoanes, A. S.; D'Agostino, M. V.; Damon, E.; Dawson, J. V.; Dazeley, S.; Dietrich, D.; Djurcic, Zelimir; Dracos, M.; Durand, V.; Ebert, J.; Efremenko, Y.; Elnimr, M.; Erickson, A.; Etenko, A.; Fallot, M.; Fechner, M.; von Feilitzsch, F.; Felde, J.; Fernandes, S. M.; Fischer, V.; Franco, D.; Franke, A. J.; Franke, M.; Furuta, H.; Gama, R.; Gil-Botella, I.; Giot, L.; Goger-Neff, M.; Gonzalez, L. F. G.; Goodenough, L.; Goodman, M. C.; Goon, J. T. M.; Greiner, D.; Haag, N.; Habib, S.; Hagner, C.; Hara, T.; Hartmann, F. X.; Haser, J.; Hatzikoutelis, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hofmann, M.; Horton-Smith, Glenn A.; Hourlier, A.; Ishitsuka, M.; Jochum, J.; Jollet, C.; Jones, C. L.; Kaether, F.; Kalousis, L. N.; Kamyshkov, Y.; Kaplan, D. M.; Kawasaki, T.; Keefer, G.; Kemp, E.; de Kerret, H.; Kibe, Y.; Konno, T.; Kryn, D.; Kuze, M.; Lachenmaier, Tobias; Lane, C. E.; Langbrandtner, C.; Lasserre, T.; Letourneau, A.; Lhuillier, D.; Lima, H. P.; Lindner, M.; Lopez-Castano, J. M.; LoSecco, J. M.; Lubsandorzhiev, B. K.; Lucht, S.; McKee, D.; Maeda, J.; Maesano, C. N.; Mariani, Camillo; Maricic, Jelena; Martino, J.; Matsubara, T.; Mention, G.; Meregaglia, A.; Meyer, M.; Miletic, T.; Milincic, R.; Miyata, H.; Mueller, T. A.; Nagasaka, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Novella, P.; Obolensky, M.; Oberauer, L.; Onillon, A.; Osborn, A.; Ostrovskiy, I.; Palomares, C.; Pepe, I. M.; Perasso, S.; Perrin, P.; Pfahler, P.; Porta, A.; Potzel, W.; Pronost, G.; Reichenbacher, J.; Reinhold, B.; Remoto, A.; Roehling, M.; Roncin, R.; Roth, S.; Rybolt, B.; Sakamoto, Y.; Santorelli, R.; Sato, F.; Schoenert, S.; Schoppmann, S.; Schwetz, T.; Shaevitz, Marjorie Hansen; Shimojima, S.; Shrestha, D.; Sida, J. L.; Sinev, V.; Skorokhvatov, Mikhail D.; Smith, E.; Spitz, Joshua; Stahl, A.; Stancu, Ion; Stokes, Lee F. F.; Strait, M.; Stuken, A.; Suekane, F.; Sukhotin, S.; Sumiyoshi, T.; Sun, Y.; Svoboda, R.; Terao, K.; Tonazzo, A.; Toups, M.; Thi, H. H. T.; Valdiviesso, G. A.; Veyssiere, C.; Wagner, S.; Watanabe, H.; White, B.; Wiebusch, C.; Winslow, L.; Worcester, M.; Wurm, M.; Yermia, F.; Zimmer, V.; Double Chooz, Collaboration (American Physical Society, 2013-01-08)
Double Chooz is unique among modern reactor-based neutrino experiments studying (nu) over bar (e) disappearance in that data can be collected with all reactors off. In this paper, we present data from 7.53 days of reactor-off running. Applying the same selection criteria as used in the Double Chooz reactor-on oscillation analysis, a measured background rate of 1.0 +/- 0.4 events/day is obtained. The background model for accidentals, cosmogenic beta-n-emitting isotopes, fast neutrons from cosmic muons, and stopped-mu decays used in the oscillation analysis is demonstrated to be correct within the uncertainties. Kinematic distributions of the events, which are dominantly cosmic-ray-produced correlated-background events, are provided. The background rates are scaled to the shielding depths of two other reactor-based oscillation experiments, Daya Bay and RENO.
The edge of supersymmetry: Stability walls in heterotic theory
Anderson, Lara B.; Gray, James A.; Lukas, Andre; Ovrut, Burt (Elsevier, 2009-06-22)
First measurement of the muon antineutrino double-differential charged-current quasielastic cross section
Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A.; Brown, B. C.; Bugel, L.; Cheng, G.; Church, E. D.; Conrad, Janet M.; Dharmapalan, R.; Djurcic, Zelimir; Finley, D. A.; Ford, R.; Garcia, F. G.; Garvey, G. T.; Grange, J.; Huelsnitz, W.; Ignarra, C. M.; Imlay, R.; Johnson, R. A.; Karagiorgi, Georgia S.; Katori, T.; Kobilarcik, T.; Louis, W. C.; Mariani, Camillo; Marsh, W.; Mills, G. B.; Mirabal, J.; Moore, C. D.; Mousseau, J.; Nienaber, P.; Osmanov, B.; Pavlovic, Z.; Perevalov, D.; Polly, C. C.; Ray, H.; Roe, B. P.; Russell, A. D.; Shaevitz, Marjorie Hansen; Spitz, Joshua; Stancu, Ion; Tayloe, R.; Van de Water, R. G.; Wascko, M. O.; White, D. H.; Wickremasinghe, D. A.; Zeller, Geralyn P.; Zimmerman, E. D.; MiniBoo, N. E. Collaboration (American Physical Society, 2013-08-02)
The largest sample ever recorded of (nu) over bar (mu) charged-current quasielastic (CCQE, (nu) over bar (mu) + p -> mu(+) + n) candidate events is used to produce the minimally model-dependent, flux-integrated double-differential cross section d(2)sigma/dT(mu) d cos theta(mu) for (nu) over bar (mu) CCQE for a mineral oil target. This measurement exploits the large statistics of the MiniBooNE antineutrino mode sample and provides the most complete information of this process to date. In order to facilitate historical comparisons, the flux-unfolded total cross section sigma(E-nu) and single-differential cross section d sigma/dQ(2) on both mineral oil and on carbon are also reported. The observed cross section is somewhat higher than the predicted cross section from a model assuming independently acting nucleons in carbon with canonical form factor values. The shape of the data are also discrepant with this model. These results have implications for intranuclear processes and can help constrain signal and background processes for future neutrino oscillation measurements.
First test of Lorentz violation with a reactor-based antineutrino experiment
Abe, Y.; Aberle, C.; dos Anjos, J. C.; Bergevin, M.; Bernstein, A.; Bezerra, T. J. C.; Bezrukhov, Leonid B.; Blucher, E.; Bowden, N. S.; Buck, C.; Busenitz, J.; Cabrera, A.; Caden, E.; Camilleri, Leslie; Carr, Rachel E.; Cerrada, M.; Chang, P. J.; Chimenti, P.; Classen, T.; Collin, A. P.; Conover, E.; Conrad, Janet M.; Crespo-Anadon, J. I.; Crum, K.; Cucoanes, A. S.; D'Agostino, M. V.; Damon, E.; Dawson, J. V.; Dazeley, S.; Dietrich, D.; Djurcic, Zelimir; Dracos, M.; Durand, V.; Ebert, J.; Efremenko, Y.; Elnimr, M.; Erickson, A.; Fallot, M.; Fechner, M.; von Feilitzsch, F.; Felde, J.; Fischer, V.; Franco, D.; Franke, A. J.; Franke, M.; Furuta, H.; Gama, R.; Gil-Botella, I.; Giot, L.; Goger-Neff, M.; Gonzalez, L. F. G.; Goodman, M. C.; Goon, J. T.; Greiner, D.; Haag, N.; Habib, S.; Hagner, C.; Hara, T.; Hartmann, F. X.; Haser, J.; Hatzikoutelis, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hofmann, M.; Horton-Smith, Glenn A.; Ishitsuka, M.; Jochum, J.; Jollet, C.; Jones, C. L.; Kaether, F.; Kalousis, L. N.; Kamyshkov, Y.; Kaplan, D. M.; Katori, T.; Kawasaki, T.; Keefer, G.; Kemp, E.; de Kerret, H.; Konno, T.; Kryn, D.; Kuze, M.; Lachenmaier, Tobias; Lane, C. E.; Lasserre, T.; Letourneau, A.; Lhuillier, D.; Lima, H. P.; Lindner, M.; Lopez-Castano, J. M.; LoSecco, J. M.; Lubsandorzhiev, B. K.; Lucht, S.; McKee, D.; Maeda, J.; Maesano, C. N.; Mariani, Camillo; Maricic, Jelena; Martino, J.; Matsubara, T.; Mention, G.; Meregaglia, A.; Meyer, M.; Miletic, T.; Milincic, R.; Miyata, H.; Mueller, T. A.; Nagasaka, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Novella, P.; Obolensky, M.; Oberauer, L.; Onillon, A.; Osborn, A.; Ostrovskiy, I.; Palomares, C.; Pepe, I. M.; Perasso, S.; Perrin, P.; Pfahler, P.; Porta, A.; Potzel, W.; Pronost, G.; Reichenbacher, J.; Reinhold, B.; Remoto, A.; Roehling, M.; Roncin, R.; Roth, S.; Rybolt, B.; Sakamoto, Y.; Santorelli, R.; Sato, F.; Schoenert, S.; Schoppmann, S.; Schwetz, T.; Shaevitz, Marjorie Hansen; Shrestha, D.; Sida, J. L.; Sinev, V.; Skorokhvatov, Mikhail D.; Smith, E.; Spitz, Joshua; Stahl, A.; Stancu, Ion; Stokes, Lee F. F.; Strait, M.; Stuken, A.; Suekane, F.; Sukhotin, S.; Sumiyoshi, T.; Sun, Y.; Terao, K.; Tonazzo, A.; Toups, M.; Thi, H. H. T.; Valdiviesso, G. A.; Veyssiere, C.; Wagner, S.; Watanabe, H.; White, B.; Wiebusch, C.; Winslow, L.; Worcester, M.; Wurm, M.; Yanovitch, E.; Yermia, F.; Zimmer, V.; Double Chooz, Collaboration (American Physical Society, 2012-12-28)
We present a search for Lorentz violation with 8249 candidate electron antineutrino events taken by the Double Chooz experiment in 227.9 live days of running. This analysis, featuring a search for a sidereal time dependence of the events, is the first test of Lorentz invariance using a reactor-based antineutrino source. No sidereal variation is present in the data and the disappearance results are consistent with sidereal time independent oscillations. Under the Standard-Model Extension, we set the first limits on 14 Lorentz violating coefficients associated with transitions between electron and tau flavor, and set two competitive limits associated with transitions between electron and muon flavor.
Reactor (nu)over-bar(e) disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment
Abe, Y.; Aberle, C.; dos Anjos, J. C.; Barriere, J. C.; Bergevin, M.; Bernstein, A.; Bezerra, T. J. C.; Bezrukhov, Leonid B.; Blucher, E.; Bowden, N. S.; Buck, C.; Busenitz, J.; Cabrera, A.; Caden, E.; Camilleri, Leslie; Carr, Rachel E.; Cerrada, M.; Chang, P. J.; Chimenti, P.; Classen, T.; Collin, A. P.; Conover, E.; Conrad, Janet M.; Crespo-Anadon, J. I.; Crum, K.; Cucoanes, A. S.; D'Agostino, M. V.; Damon, E.; Dawson, J. V.; Dazeley, S.; Dietrich, D.; Djurcic, Zelimir; Dracos, M.; Durand, V.; Ebert, J.; Efremenko, Y.; Elnimr, M.; Etenko, A.; Fallot, M.; Fechner, M.; von Feilitzsch, F.; Felde, J.; Franco, D.; Franke, A. J.; Franke, M.; Furuta, H.; Gama, R.; Gil-Botella, I.; Giot, L.; Goger-Neff, M.; Gonzalez, L. F. G.; Goodman, M. C.; Goon, J. T. M.; Greiner, D.; Haag, N.; Hagner, C.; Hara, T.; Hartmann, F. X.; Haser, J.; Hatzikoutelis, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hofmann, M.; Horton-Smith, Glenn A.; Hourlier, A.; Ishitsuka, M.; Jochum, J.; Jollet, C.; Jones, C. L.; Kaether, F.; Kalousis, L. N.; Kamyshkov, Y.; Kaplan, D. M.; Kawasaki, T.; Keefer, G.; Kemp, E.; de Kerret, H.; Kibe, Y.; Konno, T.; Kryn, D.; Kuze, M.; Lachenmaier, Tobias; Lane, C. E.; Langbrandtner, C.; Lasserre, T.; Letourneau, A.; Lhuillier, D.; Lima, H. P.; Lindner, M.; Lopez-Castano, J. M.; LoSecco, J. M.; Lubsandorzhiev, B. K.; Lucht, S.; McKee, D.; Maeda, J.; Maesano, C. N.; Mariani, Camillo; Maricic, Jelena; Martino, J.; Matsubara, T.; Mention, G.; Meregaglia, A.; Miletic, T.; Milincic, R.; Miyata, H.; Mueller, T. A.; Nagasaka, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Novella, P.; Obolensky, M.; Oberauer, L.; Onillon, A.; Osborn, A.; Ostrovskiy, I.; Palomares, C.; Pepe, I. M.; Perasso, S.; Perrin, P.; Pfahler, P.; Porta, A.; Potzel, W.; Reichenbacher, J.; Reinhold, B.; Remoto, A.; Roehling, M.; Roncin, R.; Roth, S.; Sakamoto, Y.; Santorelli, R.; Sato, F.; Schoenert, S.; Schoppmann, S.; Schwetz, T.; Shaevitz, Marjorie Hansen; Shimojima, S.; Shrestha, D.; Sida, J. L.; Sinev, V.; Skorokhvatov, Mikhail D.; Smith, E.; Spitz, Joshua; Stahl, A.; Stancu, Ion; Stokes, Lee F. F.; Strait, M.; Stuken, A.; Suekane, F.; Sukhotin, S.; Sumiyoshi, T.; Sun, Y.; Svoboda, R.; Terao, K.; Tonazzo, A.; Toups, M.; Thi, H. H. T.; Valdiviesso, G. A.; Veyssiere, C.; Wagner, S.; Watanabe, H.; White, B.; Wiebusch, C.; Winslow, L.; Worcester, M.; Wurm, M.; Yermia, F.; Zimmer, V.; Double Chooz, Collaboration (American Physical Society, 2012-09-18)
The Double Chooz experiment has observed 8249 candidate electron antineutrino events in 227.93 live days with 33.71 GW-ton-years (reactor power X detector mass X live time) exposure using a 10.3 m(3) fiducial volume detector located at 1050 m from the reactor cores of the Chooz nuclear power plant in France. The expectation in case of theta(13) = 0 is 8937 events. The deficit is interpreted as evidence of electron antineutrino disappearance. From a rate plus spectral shape analysis we find sin(2)2 theta(13) = 0.109 +/- 0.030(stat) +/- 0.025(syst). The data exclude the no-oscillation hypothesis at 99.8% CL (2.9 sigma).
Systematic uncertainties in long-baseline neutrino oscillations for large theta(13)
Coloma, P.; Huber, Patrick; Kopp, J.; Winter, W. (American Physical Society, 2013-02-11)
We study the physics potential of future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments at large theta(13), focusing especially on systematic uncertainties. We discuss superbeams, beta beams, and neutrino factories, and for the first time compare these experiments on an equal footing with respect to systematic errors. We explicitly simulate near detectors for all experiments; we use the same implementation of systematic uncertainties for all experiments; and we fully correlate the uncertainties among detectors, oscillation channels, and beam polarizations as appropriate. As our primary performance indicator, we use the achievable precision in the measurement of the CP-violating phase delta. We find that a neutrino factory is the only instrument that can measure delta with a precision similar to that of its quark sector counterpart. All neutrino beams operating at peak energies >= 2 GeV are quite robust with respect to systematic uncertainties, whereas especially beta beams and T2HK suffer from large cross-section uncertainties in the quasielastic regime, combined with their inability to measure the appearance signal cross sections at the near detector. A noteworthy exception is the combination of a gamma = 100 beta beam with an SPL-based superbeam, in which all relevant cross sections can be measured in a self-consistent way. This provides a performance second only to that of the neutrino factory. For other superbeam experiments such as LBNO and the setups studied in the context of the LBNE reconfiguration effort, statistics turns out to be the bottleneck. In almost all cases, the near detector is not critical to control systematics, since the combined fit of appearance and disappearance data already constrains the impact of systematics to be small, provided that the three-active-flavor oscillation framework is valid.

Browse

Browsing Center for Neutrino Physics by Subject "Astronomy & Astrophysics"

Results Per Page

Sort Options