Aquatic animals, such as fish and shellfish, provide important economic and nutritional benefits for human society. Due to overexploitation of natural fish sources through traditional wild-caught fisheries, aquaculture (generally described as fish farming or culturing) has grown into an economically important industry. A major focus area for the aquaculture field is related to sustainability by ensuring the health and welfare of the aquatic animals. Communities of microorganisms inhabiting the various niches of a given host comprise its microbiome and provide several key health benefits. The microbiome impacts nutrient acquisition, gut homeostasis, protection against pathogens, and immune system modulation. Therefore, much attention has been placed on studying how various culturing conditions and host factors impact the microbiomes of aquatic animals. Here, multiple studies were conducted to elucidate the impacts of various parameters on the microbiomes of rainbow trout, steelhead trout, and Nile tilapia, including dietary supplementation, administration of probiotics and animal age. Though there is a significant correlation between the diet fed to fish and their microbiome communities, small dietary changes such as the inclusion of a dried and lysed yeast product, acting as a protein source alternative to unsustainable fishmeal did not significantly alter the intestinal adherent microbiome of rainbow trout. Moreover, an optimal percentage of yeast replacement that did not negatively impact weight gain for the aquaculture-raised fish was identified, suggesting its efficacy for the industry. Similarly, the intestinal adherent microbiomes of steelhead trout were not significantly altered by diet supplementation with a Bacillus subtilis probiotic. The total microbiome of steelhead trout (mucosa combined with digesta) was instead significantly changed when they were only fed the probiotic additive at an early stage of intestinal development. This change in the microbiome of steelhead trout correlated with a significant increase in weight gain compared to fish only fed the probiotic during later stages of intestinal development. These findings also corroborate previous observations wherein the intestinal microbiome of fish varies during their developmental stages but then stabilizes over time. Determining the core set of bacteria present in fish microbiomes, independent of treatment variables, is another important factor when considering attempts to manipulate the microbiome. To that end, a literature review was conducted in which the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and, to a lesser extent, Actinobacteria, Bacteroides, and Tenericutes were identified as likely members of the rainbow trout core microbiome. Bacterial families identified as part of the core phyla included Lactobacilliaceae that are commonly used as probiotics and Mycoplasmataceae that lack cell walls. Preventing dysbiosis of the rainbow trout microbiomes will be crucial to ensuring the health of the fish hosts and increasing longevity and profitability of the aquaculture industry. Another important aquaculture-raised species is the Eastern oyster. This animal is critical for the ecological health of the Chesapeake Bay, and it is also an important source of revenue. A significant portion of the revenue flow is the harvest and sale of live oysters for consumption. Unfortunately, consumption of raw or undercooked oysters is the most common route of infection by the human pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus (VP) as oysters are a natural reservoir for VP. This bacterium is responsible for a debilitating acute gastroenteritis with potential to cause fatal septicemia. Despite efforts to mitigate infection by this CDC-reportable pathogen, cases continue to increase. The understudied host-microbe relationship between the Eastern oyster and VP has been implicated as a path to research for potential future therapeutics. A novel culturing system for oysters was created using fermentation jars within a BSL-2 ready biosafety cabinet. Using this system, the effect of harvest season was tested against the inoculation efficiency of VP. It was found that higher native Vibrio levels within the oysters were present during the summer compared to the winter. Moreover, addition of the bacteriostatic antibiotic chloramphenicol (Cm) enabled a higher inoculation efficiency by VP during both the summer and winter compared to oysters not exposed to the antibiotic. During the winter, exposure to Cm led to the highest inoculation efficiency (~100%). These findings confirm the importance of the existing microbial communities against exogenous inoculation. Therefore, a year-long study was conducted to investigate the microbiome of oysters during each season. This pan-microbiome study identified a significant impact of harvest season on the microbiome structure. An increased diversity, including higher levels of Cyanobacteriaceae, was observed during the summer. Whereas an increase in Arcobacteriaceae was observed during the winter. Bacteria that persisted throughout the year included Mycoplamataceae and Spirochaeteacae; these families may represent potential members of the Eastern oyster core microbiome. Further work is needed to study the localization patterns of VP within oysters. Such work includes further optimization of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and intracellular colonization assay methods under development here. Collectively, studies of the oyster-microbe interactions will help improve aquaculture methods and identify mitigation targets to reduce VP-related clinical infections.