Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlukwe, Isaac A.en
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-24T08:00:24Zen
dc.date.available2013-04-24T08:00:24Zen
dc.date.issued2013-04-23en
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:506en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/19339en
dc.description.abstractPreventing impairment of waterbodies requires control, reduction and interception of contaminant losses at the field and subwatershed level. Three specific research objectives were accomplished in this study: 1) compare the HSPF-predicted flow, sediment, total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loads resulting from simulation of spatially distributed site-specific and county-level disaggregated land use data at subwatershed and watershed levels, 2) evaluate the effects of site-specific and county-level disaggregated BMP data on modeled BMP responses in HSPF-predicted flow, sediment, TN and TP loads at the watershed level, and 3) analyze the long-term effects of the two spatial BMP datasets on achieving the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) goals for sediment, TN and TP. Site-specific data are derived from the local watershed inventory while disaggregated data are based on county-level aggregated data that are distributed to portions of river segments that intersect each county. The study site was the Upper Opequon Watershed in northern Virginia. Results for each research objective are as follows: (1) HSPF-predicted flow, sediment, TN and TP were higher using disaggregated land use data in subwatersheds at monthly and annual time-steps. (2) Predicted load reductions were higher with site-specific BMP data than with disaggregated data for the study watershed. (3) Current levels of cost-shared BMP implementation in the Upper Opequon Watershed using either site-specific or county-level disaggregated BMP datasets do not meet the Chesapeake Bay TMDL goals. Increasing BMP implementation level to 100% of the available land also failed to meet TMDL target goals. Generally, use of disaggregated land use data does not accurately represent the existing watershed conditions. Further, for the study watershed, use of disaggregated county-level BMP data poorly represented actual watershed conditions, which resulted in higher pollutant yields and higher levels of BMPs needed to meet water quality goals. The study suggests that site-specific land use and BMP data must be used during TMDL implementation planning to maintain credibility with local stakeholders and improve the accuracy of the developed implementation plans.en
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectBest Management Practicesen
dc.subjectBMP Reductionen
dc.subjectTMDLen
dc.subjectTarget Goalsen
dc.subjectWater Qualityen
dc.titleEvaluating the Effects of Watershed Land Use Distribution and BMP Data on HSPF  Water Quality Predictionsen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.contributor.departmentBiological Systems Engineeringen
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.disciplineBiological Systems Engineeringen
dc.contributor.committeechairDillaha, Theo A. IIIen
dc.contributor.committeememberWolfe, Mary Leighen
dc.contributor.committeememberHession, W. Cullyen
dc.contributor.committeememberGodrej, Adil N.en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record