Nondifferentiable Optimization of Lagrangian Dual Formulations for Linear Programs with Recovery of Primal Solutions
This dissertation is concerned with solving large-scale, ill-structured linear programming (LP) problems via Lagrangian dual (LD) reformulations. A principal motivation for this work arises in the context of solving mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems where LP relaxations, sometimes in higher dimensional spaces, are widely used for bounding and cut-generation purposes. Often, such relaxations turn out to be large-sized, ill-conditioned problems for which simplex as well as interior point based methods can tend to be ineffective. In contrast, Lagrangian relaxation or dual formulations, when applied in concert with suitable primal recovery strategies, have the potential for providing quick bounds as well as enabling useful branching mechanisms. However, the objective function of the Lagrangian dual is nondifferentiable, and hence, we cannot apply popular gradient or Hessian-based optimization techniques that are commonly used in differentiable optimization. Moreover, the subgradient methods that are popularly used are typically slow to converge and tend to stall while yet remote from optimality. On the other hand, more advanced methods, such as the bundle method and the space dilation method, involve additional computational and storage requirements that make them impractical for large-scale applications. Furthermore, although we might derive an optimal or near-optimal solution for LD, depending on the dual-adequacy of the methodology used, a primal solution may not be available. While some algorithmically simple primal solution recovery schemes have been developed in theory to accompany Lagrangian dual optimization, their practical performance has been disappointing. Rectifying these inadequacies is a challenging task that constitutes the focal point for this dissertation. Many practical applications dealing with production planning and control, engineering design, and decision-making in different operational settings fall within the purview of this context and stand to gain by advances in this technology.
With this motivation, our primary interests in the present research effort are to develop effective nondifferentiable optimization (NDO) methods for solving Lagrangian duals of large-sized linear programs, and to design practical primal solution recovery techniques. This contribution would then facilitate the derivation of quick bounds/cuts and branching mechanisms in the context of branch-and-bound/cut methodologies for solving mixed-integer programming problems.
We begin our research by adapting the Volume Algorithm (VA) of Barahona and Anbil (2000) developed at IBM as a direction-finding strategy within the variable target value method (VTVM) of Sherali et al. (2000). This adaptation makes VA resemble a deflected subgradient scheme in contrast with the bundle type interpretation afforded by the modification of VA as proposed by Bahiense et al. (2002). Although VA was originally developed in order to recover a primal optimal solution, we first present an example to demonstrate that it might indeed converge to a nonoptimal primal solution. However, under a suitable condition on the geometric moving average factor, we establish the convergence of the proposed algorithm in the dual space. A detailed computational study reveals that this approach yields a competitive procedure as compared with alternative strategies including the average direction strategy (ADS) of Sherali and Ulular (1989), a modified Polyak-Kelley cutting-plane strategy (PKC) designed by Sherali et al. (2001), and the modified Volume Algorithm routines RVA and BVA proposed by Bahiense et al. (2002), all embedded within the same VTVM framework. As far as CPU times are concerned, the VA strategy consumed the least computational effort for most problems to attain a near-optimal objective value. Moreover, the VA, ADS, and PKC strategies revealed considerable savings in CPU effort over a popular commercial linear program solver, CPLEX Version 8.1, when used to derive near-optimal solutions.
Next, we consider two variable target value methods, the Level Algorithm of BrÃ¤nnlund (1993) and VTVM, which require no prior knowledge of upper bounds on the optimal objective value while guaranteeing convergence to an optimal solution. We evaluate these two algorithms in conjunction with various direction-finding and step-length strategies such as PS, ADS, VA, and PKC. Furthermore, we generalize the PKC strategy by further modifying the cutâ s right-hand-side values and additionally performing sequential projections onto some previously generated Polyak-Kelleyâ s cutting-planes. We call this a generalized PKC (GPKC) strategy. Moreover, we point out some latent deficiencies in the two aforementioned variable target value algorithms in regard to their target value update mechanisms, and we suggest modifications in order to alleviate these shortcomings. We further explore an additional local search procedure to strengthen the performance of the algorithms. Noting that no related convergence analyses have been presented, we prove the convergence of the Level Algorithm when used in conjunction with the ADS, VA, or GPKC schemes. We also establish the convergence of VTVM when employing GPKC. Based on our computational study, the modified VTVM algorithm produced the best quality solutions when implemented with the GPKC strategy, where the latter performs sequential projections onto the four most recently generated Polyak-Kelley cutting-planes as available. Also, we demonstrate that the proposed modifications and the local search technique significantly improve the overall performance. Moreover, the VTVM procedure was observed to consistently outperform the Level Algorithm as well as a popular heuristic subgradient method of Held et al. (1974) that is widely used in practice. As far as CPU times are concerned, the modified VTVM procedure in concert with the GPKC strategy revealed the best performance, providing near-optimal solutions in about 27.84% of the effort at an average as that required by CPLEX 8.1 to produce the same quality solutions.
We next consider the Lagrangian dual of a bounded-variable equality constrained linear programming problem. We develop two novel approaches for solving this problem, which attempt to circumvent or obviate the nondifferentiability of the objective function. First, noting that the Lagrangian dual function is differentiable almost everywhere, whenever the NDO algorithm encounters a nondifferentiable point, we employ a proposed perturbation technique (PT) in order to detect a differentiable point in the vicinity of the current solution from which a further search can be conducted. In a second approach, called the barrier-Lagrangian dual reformulation (BLR) method, the primal problem is reformulated by constructing a barrier function for the set of bounding constraints such that an optimal solution to the original problem can be recovered by suitably adjusting the barrier parameter. However, instead of solving the barrier problem itself, we dualize the equality constraints to formulate a Lagrangian dual function, which is shown to be twice differentiable. Since differentiable pathways are made available via these two proposed techniques, we can advantageously utilize differentiable optimization methods along with popular conjugate gradient schemes. Based on these constructs, we propose an algorithmic procedure that consists of two sequential phases. In Phase I, the PT and BLR methods along with various deflected gradient strategies are utilized, and then, in Phase II, we switch to the modified VTVM algorithm in concert with GPKC (VTVM-GPKC) that revealed the best performance in the previous study. We also designed two target value initialization methods to commence Phase II, based on the output from Phase I. The computational results reveal that Phase I indeed helps to significantly improve the algorithmic performance as compared with implementing VTVM-GPKC alone, even though the latter was run for twice as many iterations as used in the two-phase procedures. Among the implemented procedures, the PT method in concert with certain prescribed deflection and Phase II initialization schemes yielded the best overall quality solutions and CPU time performance, consuming only 3.19% of the effort as that required by CPLEX 8.1 to produce comparable solutions. Moreover, we also tested some ergodic primal recovery strategies with and without employing BLR as a warm-start, and observed that an initial BLR phase can significantly enhance the convergence of such primal recovery schemes.
Having observed that the VTVM algorithm requires the fine-tuning of several parameters for different classes of problems in order to improve its performance, our next research investigation focuses on developing a robust variable target value framework that entails the management of only a few parameters. We therefore design a novel algorithm, called the Trust Region Target Value (TRTV) method, in which a trust region is constructed in the dual space, and its center and size are adjusted in a manner that eventually induces a dual optimum to lie at the center of the hypercube trust region. A related convergence analysis has also been conducted for this procedure. We additionally examined a variation of TRTV, where the hyperrectangular trust region is more effectively adjusted for normalizing the effects of the dual variables. In our computational study, we compared the performance of TRTV with that of the VTVM-GPKC procedure. For four direction-finding strategies (PS, VA, ADS, and GPKC), the TRTV algorithm consistently produced better quality solutions than did VTVM-GPKC. The best performance was obtained when TRTV was employed in concert with the PS strategy. Moreover, we observed that the solution quality produced by TRTV was consistently better than that obtained via VTVM, hence lending a greater degree of robustness. As far as computational effort is concerned, the TRTV-PS combination consumed only 4.94% of the CPU time required by CPLEX 8.1 at an average in order to find comparable quality solutions. Therefore, based on our extensive set of test problems, it appears that the TRTV along with the PS strategy is the best and the most robust procedure among those tested.
Finally, we explore an outer-linearization (or cutting-plane) method along with a trust region approach for refining available dual solutions and recovering a primal optimum in the process. This method enables us to escape from a jamming phenomenon experienced at a non-optimal point, which commonly occurs when applying NDO methods, as well as to refine the available dual solution toward a dual optimum. Furthermore, we can recover a primal optimal solution when the resulting dual solution is close enough to a dual optimum, without generating a potentially excessive set of constraints. In our computational study, we tested two such trust region strategies, the Box-step (BS) method of Marsten et al. (1975) and a new Box Trust Region (BTR) approach, both appended to the foregoing TRTV-PS dual optimization methodology. Furthermore, we also experimented with deleting nonbinding constraints when the number of cuts exceeds a prescribed threshold value. This proposed refinement was able to further improve the solution quality, reducing the near-zero relative optimality gap for TRTV-PS by 20.6-32.8%. The best strategy turned out to be using the BTR method while deleting nonbinding constraints (BTR-D). As far as the recovery of optimal solutions is concerned, the BTR-D scheme resulted in the best measure of primal feasibility, and although it was terminated after it had accumulated only 50 constraints, it revealed a better performance than the ergodic primal recovery scheme of Shor (1985) that was run for 2000 iterations while also assuming knowledge of the optimal objective value in the dual scheme.
In closing, we mention that there exist many optimization methods for complex systems such as communication network design, semiconductor manufacturing, and supply chain management, that have been formulated as large-sized mixed-integer programs, but for which deriving even near-optimal solutions has been elusive due to their exorbitant computational requirements. Noting that the computational effort for solving mixed-integer programs via branch-and-bound/cut methods strongly depends on the effectiveness with which the underlying linear programming relaxations can be solved, applying theoretically convergent and practically effective NDO methods in concert with efficient primal recovery procedures to suitable Lagrangian dual reformulations of these relaxations can significantly enhance the overall computational performance of these methods. We therefore hope that the methodologies designed and analyzed in this research effort will have a notable positive impact on analyzing such complex systems.
|dc.rights||I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Virginia Tech or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.||en_US|
|dc.subject||Variable Target Value Method||en_US|
|dc.title||Nondifferentiable Optimization of Lagrangian Dual Formulations for Linear Programs with Recovery of Primal Solutions||en_US|
|dc.contributor.department||Industrial and Systems Engineering||en_US|
|thesis.degree.grantor||Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University||en_US|
|thesis.degree.discipline||Industrial and Systems Engineering||en_US|
|dc.contributor.committeechair||Sherali, Hanif D.||en_US|
|dc.contributor.committeemember||Fraticelli, Barbara M. P.||en_US|
|dc.contributor.committeemember||Loganathan, G. V.||en_US|
|dc.contributor.committeemember||Sarin, Subhash C.||en_US|
|dc.contributor.committeemember||Bish, Ebru K.||en_US|
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Doctoral Dissertations