Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Tae-Ho
dc.contributor.authorItti, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorMather, Mara
dc.description.abstractArousal-biased competition theory predicts that arousal biases competition in favor of perceptually salient stimuli and against non-salient stimuli (Mather and Sutherland, 2011). The current study tested this hypothesis by having observers complete many trials in a visual search task in which the target either always was salient (a 55° tilted line among 80° distractors) or non-salient (a 55° tilted line among 50° distractors). Each participant completed one session in an emotional condition, in which visual search trials were preceded by negative arousing images, and one session in a non-emotional condition, in which the arousing images were replaced with neutral images (with session order counterbalanced). Test trials in which the target line had to be selected from among a set of lines with different tilts revealed that the emotional condition enhanced identification of the salient target line tilt but impaired identification of the non-salient target line tilt.Thus, arousal enhanced perceptual learning of salient stimuli but impaired perceptual learning of non-salient stimuli.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.subjectbottom-up salience
dc.subjectemotional arousal
dc.subjectoptimal gain bias
dc.subjectpop-out search
dc.subjectvisual search
dc.titleEvidence for arousal-biased competition in perceptual learning
dc.typeArticle - Refereed
dc.title.serialFrontiers in Psychology

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
License: Attribution 4.0 International