China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual?
dc.contributor.author | Bennett, M. T. | en |
dc.contributor.department | Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase | en |
dc.coverage.spatial | China | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-19T19:31:28Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-19T19:31:28Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en |
dc.description | Metadata only record | en |
dc.description.abstract | This article discusses China's Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP), assessing both innovative and problematic aspects of the program. Four suggestions to improve the program are: 1) greater community involvement; 2) more technical and financial support; 3) clearer specification of the targeted environmental services and expectations; and 4) integration of SLCP with other rural policies. | en |
dc.description.notes | PES-1 (Payments for Environmental Services Associate Award) | en |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | en |
dc.identifier | 3429 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Economics 65(4): 699-711 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.017 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/67537 | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Payments for environmental services | en |
dc.subject | Program planning | en |
dc.subject | Government policy | en |
dc.subject | Afforestation | en |
dc.subject | Land use management | en |
dc.subject | Forests | en |
dc.subject | PES | en |
dc.subject | China | en |
dc.subject | Sloping land conversion program (slcp) | en |
dc.subject | Implementation | en |
dc.subject | Program design | en |
dc.subject | Farm/Enterprise Scale Governance | en |
dc.title | China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? | en |
dc.type | Abstract | en |
dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |