Essays on Behavioral Epidemic Modeling: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Contributions
| dc.contributor.author | Osi, Ann Ogechi | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Ghaffarzadegan, Navid | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Chen, Xi | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Xu, Ran | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Ruktanonchai, Nick W. | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Industrial and Systems Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-19T08:00:33Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-19T08:00:33Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07-18 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Understanding the interplay between infectious disease transmission and human behavior is essential for developing epidemic models that can reliably inform public health policy. Behavioral epidemic models capture the dynamic feedback between human behavior and disease spread. Models that incorporate this relationship endogenously have better long-term forecasting accuracy and can anticipate shifts in epidemic waves. However, many existing models are theoretical, rely on simplistic behavioral assumptions, and lack empirical validation. Strengthening the integration of human behavior into epidemic models is crucial for improving forecasting accuracy and designing policies that are adaptive to behavioral change in future pandemics. This dissertation advances the science and methods of behavioral epidemic modeling through three essays. The first essay addresses challenges in parameter estimation, showing that early-pandemic data often produces biased estimates, and that data spanning at least one full epidemic wave are necessary for reliable inference. The second essay develops a behavioral epidemic model incorporating response to perceived risk, policy shifts, adherence fatigue, and societal learning. Tested against data from eight countries, the model replicates trends in deaths, mobility, pandemic fatigue, and policy changes, offering a comprehensive depiction of the feedback loops between behavior and disease spread. The third essay empirically tests theoretical assumptions about societal response to perceived risk in epidemics using established psychological theories. It finds that behavioral sensitivity to epidemiological indicators varies with cumulative deaths, vaccination coverage, deviations from shifting reference points, and indicators of pandemic fatigue or shifting social norms. Collectively, these essays highlight the value of data-driven, feedback-rich models that incorporate a broad range of human behavioral dynamics rooted in social and psychological theory, and are tested against diverse data, over extended periods, and multiple regions. These contributions enhance our capacity to accurately forecast disease trajectories and design policies that remain effective as public behavior evolves over the course of an epidemic. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that public behavior, like wearing masks and social distancing, can significantly affect the outcomes of a disease outbreak. At the same time, people adjust their behavior depending on how serious the outbreak is. Scientists have created epidemic models that include this two-way relationship to improve forecasts of disease spread and design policies to help slow down disease transmission. However, many of these models use simplistic assumptions that do not rely on real-world observations and theories of human behavior. This dissertation explores methods to improve how behavior is represented in epidemic models in three studies. In the first study, we show that it is required to have data spanning a full wave of a pandemic to reliably project future disease spread. In the second study, we develop a model that replicates trends in deaths, mobility, pandemic fatigue, and policy changes across eight countries by including detailed aspects of how human behavior affects disease spread. In the third essay, we use theories from psychology to understand why there is diminishing concern about disease severity over the course of an epidemic. Overall, the dissertation provides new ways to understand and model how people behave during pandemics. The results can be used by epidemic modelers to improve model forecasts, and by public health officials to design policies that adapt to human behavior. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:44381 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/136863 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | system dynaics | en |
| dc.subject | epidemiology | en |
| dc.subject | public health | en |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.subject | mathematical modeling | en |
| dc.subject | parameter estimation | en |
| dc.subject | human behavior | en |
| dc.title | Essays on Behavioral Epidemic Modeling: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Contributions | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Industrial and Systems Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1