Evaluation of Seed Impact Mills for Harvest Weed Seed Control in Soybean and Wheat in the Eastern United States

TR Number

Date

2024-11-11

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Virginia Tech

Abstract

Harvest Weed Seed Control (HWSC) concentrates, removes, or destroys weed seeds as they pass through the combine. Seed impact mills are modifications that are mounted directly to the back of a combine and are one way to implement HWSC. Seed impact mills kill weed seeds during harvest, preventing seeds from being added to the soil seedbank. Mills like the Redekop Seed Control Unit (SCU) and the integrated Harrington Seed Destructor (iHSD) could be used in soybean and wheat production in the eastern United States. Understanding the effectiveness and limitations of these mills is important for grower adoption. So, the aim of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of two seed impact mills, the Redekop SCU and the iHSD, in soybean and wheat. The first objective tested general seed kill of problematic species in soybean and wheat and seed kill in adverse conditions, such as high chaff flow rate into the mill and high chaff moisture. Results from objective one indicate that both the Redekop SCU and iHSD killed >98% and >91% of problematic weed seeds in soybean and wheat, respectively. Increases in chaff flow rate and chaff moisture resulted in a decrease in seed kill for specific species depending on the mill. But even at high chaff flow rates, seed kill remained >98% and >77% in soybean and wheat, respectively. At high chaff moisture, seed kill remained >98% and >74% in soybean and wheat, respectively. The second objective evaluated the percentage of weed seeds that bypassed the seed impact mill by exiting the combine in the straw fraction and the percentage of weed seeds that were killed when they entered the seed impact mill during harvest with a commercial combine. Results at field scale indicated that <5% of weed seeds bypassed the seed impact mill by exiting the combine in the straw fraction during harvest in soybean and wheat. Additionally, during a commercial harvest, the seed impact mills killed >99% and >89% of seeds in soybean and wheat, respectively. The third objective monitored population density changes for common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in soybean and Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) in wheat following a harvest with a seed impact mill. Results from objective three indicated that in the growing season following a harvest with a seed impact mill, common ragweed density was reduced by 26% and 77% in the spring and fall, respectively, in soybean, and Italian ryegrass density was reduced by 48% in wheat. The fourth objective evaluated Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and its ability to shift its flowering timing in response to HWSC. If weeds flower earlier, they could shatter seeds earlier, and those seeds would bypass HWSC. Through selective breeding, two populations of Palmer amaranth experienced a shift in flowering timing such that the third generations flowered 54.7 and 41.0 days sooner in the greenhouse than the initial generations. In a common garden experiment, the second generations flowered 5.5 and 8.9 days sooner than the initial generations. These results indicate that seed impact mills, like the Redekop SCU and iHSD, can deliver high seed kill rates to a range of weed species at commercial scale in both soybean and wheat. Even in adverse conditions, the mills still killed >74% of seed from tested species. However, weed species can adapt to HWSC selection pressures, resulting in a loss of HWSC efficacy. Overall, this research indicates that seed impact mills are a good tool that growers can implement to reduce the number of weed seeds being returned to the soil seedbank.

Description

Keywords

HWSC, Redekop Seed Control Unit, integrated Harrington Seed Destructor, iHSD, Palmer amaranth

Citation