Online Credit Recovery in a Large School Division in Virginia: Examining Factors for Participation and On-Time Graduation

dc.contributor.authorSzybisty, Christopher Conraden
dc.contributor.committeechairLowery, Charles L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberKniola, David Johnen
dc.contributor.committeememberFohl, George Christopheren
dc.contributor.committeememberBrinkmann, Jodie Lynnen
dc.contributor.departmentEducational Leadership and Policy Studiesen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T08:00:59Zen
dc.date.available2024-05-29T08:00:59Zen
dc.date.issued2024-05-28en
dc.description.abstractUnder the pressure of federal accountability for high schools in the United States to improve and maintain high rates of on-time graduation, online credit recovery has become an increasingly popular intervention to help students earn credit in a course that they have previously failed. While some studies have connected online credit recovery with positive outcomes for participants, others have found negative outcomes and poor learning experiences. Set in a large school division in Virginia, the purpose of this study was to (a) identify explanatory student factors that were associated with participation in online credit recovery and (b) compare the likelihood of on-time graduation of participants with the likelihood of on-time graduation of nonparticipants. Limited to the graduation cohorts of 2019 and 2020, there were 10,010 students in the sample from the participating school division. In the sample, 27% of students were eligible to participate in online credit recovery, but only 2.3% of students participated. Binary logistic regression models were designed to identify factors associated with participation and the likelihood of on-time graduation. Covariates considered for inclusion in the model were gender, race and ethnicity, status as an English learner, status as a student with a disability, status as homeless, status as economically disadvantaged, high school grade point average, and school. Both models failed to meet goodness of fit standards and were rejected as having fit the data. No student factors were found to have explained participation, and differences in the likelihood of on-time graduation were not identified. These findings indicated that there did not appear to be systemic participation given the studied factors, reinforced by the finding that participation was relatively uniformly distributed among the schools. The finding of a lack of significant difference in the likelihood of on-time graduation highlighted flexibility for schools in choosing their recovery interventions. State agencies may also consider collecting and publicly reporting data about student participation in online credit recovery. Opportunities for future studies include replication in other settings, particularly districts of different size and area/region, and qualitative inquiry into decisions made by school and district leaders related to credit recovery.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralUnder the pressure of federal accountability for on-time graduation rates, high schools have increasingly used online credit recovery to help at-risk students. Some studies have identified positive outcomes for students in online credit recovery; however, others have found negative outcomes and poor learning experiences. Set in a large school division in Virginia, the purpose of this study was to identify factors that were associated with participation in online credit recovery and the likelihood of on-time graduation of participants compared to non-participants. Limited to the graduation cohorts of 2019 and 2020, there were 10,010 students in the sample from the participating school division, of which 2.3% of students participated. Logistic regression models were created, and covariates considered for inclusion in the model were gender, race and ethnicity, status as an English learner, status as a student with a disability, status as homeless, status as economically disadvantaged, grade point average, and school. Both models failed to fit the data well; no associated factors were found, and graduation rates were not found to be significantly different. There did not appear to have been systemic participation, and schools appear to have flexibility in offering recovery interventions. State agencies may also consider collecting and publicly reporting of data about student participation in online credit recovery. Opportunities for future studies include replication in other settings and qualitative inquiry into decisions related to credit recovery.en
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Educationen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:40721en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/119144en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectat-risk studentsen
dc.subjectcourse failureen
dc.subjectcredit recoveryen
dc.subjecthigh schoolen
dc.subjectlogistic regressionen
dc.subjectgraduationen
dc.subjectonline learningen
dc.titleOnline Credit Recovery in a Large School Division in Virginia: Examining Factors for Participation and On-Time Graduationen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Leadership and Policy Studiesen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Szybisty_CC_T_2024.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format