Community Structure, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services in Treeline Whitebark Pine Communities: Potential Impacts from a Non-Native Pathogen

dc.contributor.authorTomback, Diana F.en
dc.contributor.authorResler, Lynn M.en
dc.contributor.authorKeane, Robert E.en
dc.contributor.authorPansing, Elizabeth R.en
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Andrew J.en
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Aaron C.en
dc.contributor.departmentGeographyen
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T15:01:43Zen
dc.date.available2017-09-20T15:01:43Zen
dc.date.issued2016-01-19en
dc.date.updated2017-09-20T15:01:43Zen
dc.description.abstractWhitebark pine (<i>Pinus albicaulis</i>) has the largest and most northerly distribution of any white pine (Subgenus <i>Strobus</i>) in North America, encompassing 18° latitude and 21° longitude in western mountains. Within this broad range, however, whitebark pine occurs within a narrow elevational zone, including upper subalpine and treeline forests, and functions generally as an important keystone and foundation species. In the Rocky Mountains, whitebark pine facilitates the development of krummholz conifer communities in the alpine-treeline ecotone (ATE), and thus potentially provides capacity for critical ecosystem services such as snow retention and soil stabilization. The invasive, exotic pathogen <i>Cronartium ribicola</i>, which causes white pine blister rust, now occurs nearly rangewide in whitebark pine communities, to their northern limits. Here, we synthesize data from 10 studies to document geographic variation in structure, conifer species, and understory plants in whitebark pine treeline communities, and examine the potential role of these communities in snow retention and regulating downstream flows. Whitebark pine mortality is predicted to alter treeline community composition, structure, and function. Whitebark pine losses in the ATE may also alter response to climate warming. Efforts to restore whitebark pine have thus far been limited to subalpine communities, particularly through planting seedlings with potential blister rust resistance. We discuss whether restoration strategies might be appropriate for treeline communities.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationTomback, D.F.; Resler, L.M.; Keane, R.E.; Pansing, E.R.; Andrade, A.J.; Wagner, A.C. Community Structure, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services in Treeline Whitebark Pine Communities: Potential Impacts from a Non-Native Pathogen. Forests 2016, 7, 21.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f7010021en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/79148en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectPinus albicaulisen
dc.subjectalpine-treeline ecotoneen
dc.subjectbiodiversityen
dc.subjectcommunity structureen
dc.subjectkeystone speciesen
dc.subjectfoundation speciesen
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen
dc.subjectexotic pathogenen
dc.subjectwhite pine blister rusten
dc.subjectrestorationen
dc.titleCommunity Structure, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services in Treeline Whitebark Pine Communities: Potential Impacts from a Non-Native Pathogenen
dc.title.serialForestsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
forests-07-00021.pdf
Size:
3.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: