Equestrian STAR: Development of an Experimental Methodology for Assessing the Biomechanical Performance of Equestrian Helmets

dc.contributor.authorDuma, Lauren A.en
dc.contributor.authorBegonia, Mark T.en
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Barryen
dc.contributor.authorJung, Caitlynen
dc.contributor.authorWood, Matthewen
dc.contributor.authorDuma, Brock G.en
dc.contributor.authorRowson, Stevenen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-22T17:25:20Zen
dc.date.available2025-05-22T17:25:20Zen
dc.date.issued2025-04-28en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The current equestrian helmet standards set minimal requirements for passing helmets, highlighting the need for a rating system that differentiates helmets based on their impact performance. This study’s objectives were to compare equestrian helmet impact response kinematics between linear-driven and oblique impact conditions and then to evaluate the effect of incorporating oblique drop tests into a previously established equestrian helmet rating system, Equestrian STAR. Methods: Oblique drop tests were conducted with 45 equestrian helmet models at two impact locations, front boss and rear boss, at an impact velocity of 6.56 m/s. The resulting peak linear and rotational head accelerations were compared to those measured during linear-driven pendulum impacts on the same helmet models. A total of 720 impact tests were performed, making this the largest published study on equestrian helmets to date. Equestrian STAR was modified to include both pendulum and oblique impacts by computing and summing weighted concussion risks for each test condition. Results: Oblique impacts had peak linear accelerations ranging from 105.8 to 204.5 g and peak rotational accelerations ranging from 3304 to 13854 rad/s2. Between the linear-driven and oblique impacts, peak linear acceleration was weakly correlated (R2 = 0.34, p < 0.001), while peak rotational acceleration was not correlated (R2 = 0.04, p = 0.21). Equestrian STAR scores calculated using both pendulum and oblique impacts suggested that the worst-performing helmet on both systems had nearly four times the concussion risk as the best-performing. Conclusion: Pendulum and oblique impacts have different methods of generating head rotation, which can highlight different modes of helmet performance. The updated Equestrian STAR helmet rating system differentiates between high-performing and low-performing helmets, enabling equestrians to purchase helmets best at reducing concussion risk and providing companies with a process to compare their helmet designs.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extent24 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03723-0en
dc.identifier.eissn1573-9686en
dc.identifier.issn0090-6964en
dc.identifier.orcidRowson, Steven [0000-0002-3227-0596]en
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10439-025-03723-0 (PII)en
dc.identifier.pmid40293632en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/134191en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40293632en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectEquestrianen
dc.subjectHelmeten
dc.subjectConcussionen
dc.subjectRatingen
dc.subjectInjuryen
dc.subjectFallen
dc.titleEquestrian STAR: Development of an Experimental Methodology for Assessing the Biomechanical Performance of Equestrian Helmetsen
dc.title.serialAnnals of Biomedical Engineeringen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherEarly Accessen
dc.type.otherJournalen
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-03-25en
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/Biomedical Engineering and Mechanicsen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/COE T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/University Research Institutesen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s10439-025-03723-0.pdf
Size:
3.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: