The order in which you cope matters: An examination of the moderating role of coping sequence on the impact of stressor type on affect
| dc.contributor.author | Minton, Brandon Tyler | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Hernandez, Jorge Ivan | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Parker, Sarah H. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Savla, Jyoti Shital | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Calderwood, Charles | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Psychology | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-09T08:00:24Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-09T08:00:24Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-05-08 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | To date, few studies have sought to investigate whether the sequence in which individuals engage in coping strategies could impact the effectiveness of those strategies. The present study utilizes an EMA data collection approach to obtain a sample of N = 93 student participants to investigate this potential impact. I analyzed the data with a type of multilevel structural equation model (MSEM) called a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM), where the individual served as the higher level and surveys collected at various time points (three per day for five consecutive days) served as the lower level nested within those individuals. Autoregressive, cross-lagged, and moderation paths were tested to see which constructs at time point T-1 were significantly related to positive affect and negative affect at time point T. Findings indicated more significant relationships for positive affect at time point T than negative affect at time point T. Among these were moderation effects of coping strategy on the relationship between the presence of an interpersonal stressor and positive affect, such that emotion-focused coping buffers that effect and problem-focused coping amplifies it. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | The history of stress and coping research lends itself well to the consideration of coping with stress as a dynamic process that has effects at later times. Different coping strategies (problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant) may be differentially effective for coping with different types of stressors. This study consists of measuring stressor type, coping strategy, positive affect, and negative affect at 15 different time points, specifically to track the impact of the presence of a stressor, the use of certain coping strategies, and positive and negative affect at any given time point on positive and negative affect at a subsequent time point. Specifically, I hypothesize that stressors decrease positive affect and increase negative affect, and that coping strategies can either buffer or intensify these effects. Support is found for the idea that emotion-focused coping buffers an interpersonal stressor's tendency to decrease positive affect. Support is also found for the idea that problem-focused coping intensifies this same tendency. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:36999 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/114980 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Stress | en |
| dc.subject | Coping | en |
| dc.subject | Sequences | en |
| dc.subject | Affect | en |
| dc.subject | Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) | en |
| dc.title | The order in which you cope matters: An examination of the moderating role of coping sequence on the impact of stressor type on affect | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Psychology | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1