Development and evaluation of a colorimetric coliphage assay detection system

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorIjzerman, M. Marianen
dc.contributor.committeechairHagedorn, Charles IIIen
dc.contributor.committeememberBerry, Duane F.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBenoit, Robert E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFalkinham, Joseph O. IIIen
dc.contributor.committeememberReneau, Raymond B. Jr.en
dc.contributor.departmentCrop and Soil Environmental Sciencesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:14:49Zen
dc.date.adate2006-06-07en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:14:49Zen
dc.date.issued1993-07-14en
dc.date.rdate2006-06-07en
dc.date.sdate2006-06-07en
dc.description.abstractA Colorimetric Coliphage Assay Detection System (CCADS) that is composed of a Liquid Colorimetric Presence-Absence (LCPA) method and a Colorimetric Agar-Based (CAB) method was developed to overcome the limitations imposed by the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater agar-based coliphage method (APHA method). Both CCADS methods are based on the induction of β-galactosidase in Escherichia coli and the release of the enzyme through a lytic cell infection. The released enzyme then cleaves a chromogenic substrate which produces a colored reaction product. The CCADS was evaluated against the APHA method under laboratory conditions using a common sewage coliphage strain as a model (American Type Culture Collection- 13706-B2), and under field conditions using water samples collected from four different sources. During the laboratory evaluation, both the LCPA and CAB methods were found to be superior in coliphage detection to the APHA method because: 1) the LCPA and CAB methods were easier to read and interpret than the APHA method, 2) the LCPA and CAB methods were not subject to false positive results, 3) the LCPA method theoretically detected fewer coliphage particles than the APHA method, and 4) the CAB method detected roughly twice the number of coliphage particles than the APHA method. During the field evaluation, the results indicated: 1) the LCP A method was as reliable as either the CAB or APHA methods in coliphage detection, 2) the LCP A and CAB methods were easier to read and interpret than the APHA method, 3) neither the LCPA method nor the CAB method were subject to false positive results, 4) the CAB method detected more coliphages than the APHA method under conditions of high fecal pollution, but both methods performed equally well in coliphage detection under conditions of low fecal contamination, and 5) the LCPA and CAB methods were equally as sensitive in coliphage detection as the APHA method. Finally, the coliphage group proved to be a useful indicator of fecal pollution in nonpotable water supplies that exhibited a high degree of fecal pollution, whereas they were not shown to be useful indicators in potable water supplies that exhibited low levels of fecal contamination. The lack of coliphage detection sensitivity under conditions of low fecal contamination does not appear to be method limited, but rather the result of inefficiencies in processing environmental samples using the concentration methods currently available.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.extentx, 91 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-06072006-124149en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072006-124149/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/38540en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1993.I593.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 28958765en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1993.I593en
dc.subject.lcshBacteriophagesen
dc.subject.lcshWater quality bioassayen
dc.titleDevelopment and evaluation of a colorimetric coliphage assay detection systemen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineCrop and Soil Environmental Sciencesen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1993.I593.pdf
Size:
4.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations