When is sensory consumption immoral?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGoenka, Shreyansen
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Manojen
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T13:14:36Zen
dc.date.available2022-12-14T13:14:36Zen
dc.date.issued2022-11-10en
dc.date.updated2022-12-14T01:15:54Zen
dc.description.abstractAlthough humans are hard-wired to pursue sensory pleasure, they show considerable heterogeneity in their moral evaluations of sensory pleasure. In some societies, sensory pleasure is pursued without any moral inhibition, but in other societies, it is considered to be immoral and actively suppressed. This research investigates the moral motives behind the suppression of sensory consumption. Is the suppression of sensory consumption caused by the moral motive to promote social justice or the moral motive to promote social order? We test these two competing accounts through country-level archival data and seven preregistered controlled experiments. We find robust evidence that the social-order emphasizing binding moral foundations (authority, loyalty, and purity; Haidt, 2007) suppress sensory consumption. Consequently, individuals and societies that adhere to the binding values are less likely to consume sensory products such as alcohol, tobacco, soda, fragrances, and sex toys. These effects are mediated by prescriptive moral beliefs and feelings of shame. We also identify several moderators of the moral suppression of sensory consumption. Binding values do not suppress sensory consumption after moral licensing. The effects of binding values on sensory consumption attenuate when the products are framed as status-affirming. Finally, while binding values suppress sensory consumption that is personal, they do not suppress sensory consumption that is shared. Altogether, our findings show that social-order emphasizing moral beliefs in society can inhibit the pursuit of pleasure and change consumption patterns in the economy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000450en
dc.identifier.eissn1939-1315en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3514en
dc.identifier.orcidGoenka, Shreyans [0000-0003-0048-5186]en
dc.identifier.other2023-16725-001 (PII)en
dc.identifier.pmid36355686en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/112880en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355686en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectMoral foundations theoryen
dc.subjectSensory pleasureen
dc.subjectConsumption preferencesen
dc.subjectMoral judgmenten
dc.subjectSocial justiceen
dc.titleWhen is sensory consumption immoral?en
dc.title.serialJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherJournal Articleen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Techen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Pamplin College of Businessen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Pamplin College of Business/Marketingen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Pamplin College of Business/PCOB T&R Facultyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
When is Sensory Consumption Immoral_Goenka&Thomas_JPSP_2022.pdf
Size:
891.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
Download

Collections

All Faculty Deposits
Scholarly Works, Department of Marketing