VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday from Wednesday November 26 through Sunday November 30. We will respond to emails on Monday December 1.
 

Instrumented Mouthguard Decoupling Affects Measured Head Kinematic Accuracy

dc.contributor.authorGellner, Ryan A.en
dc.contributor.authorBegonia, Mark T.en
dc.contributor.authorWood, Matthewen
dc.contributor.authorRockwell, Lewisen
dc.contributor.authorGeiman, Tayloren
dc.contributor.authorJung, Caitlynen
dc.contributor.authorRowson, Stevenen
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-07T19:27:26Zen
dc.date.available2025-11-07T19:27:26Zen
dc.date.issued2024-10-01en
dc.description.abstractMany recent studies have used boil-and-bite style instrumented mouthguards to measure head kinematics during impact in sports. Instrumented mouthguards promise greater accuracy than their predecessors because of their superior ability to couple directly to the skull. These mouthguards have been validated in the lab and on the field, but little is known about the effects of decoupling during impact. Decoupling can occur for various reasons, such as poor initial fit, wear-and-tear, or excessive impact forces. To understand how decoupling influences measured kinematic error, we fit a boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguard to a 3D-printed dentition mounted to a National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) headform. We also instrumented the headform with linear accelerometers and angular rate sensors at its center of gravity (CG). We performed a series of pendulum impact tests, varying impactor face and impact direction. We measured linear acceleration and angular velocity, and we calculated angular acceleration from the mouthguard and the headform CG. We created decoupling conditions by varying the gap between the lower jaw and the bottom face of the mouthguard. We tested three gap conditions: 0 mm (control), 1.6 mm, and 4.8 mm. Mouthguard measurements were transformed to the CG and compared to the reference measurements. We found that gap condition, impact duration, and impact direction significantly influenced mouthguard measurement error. Error was higher for larger gaps and in frontal (front and front boss) conditions. Higher errors were also found in padded conditions, but the mouthguards did not collect all rigid impacts due to inherent limitations. We present characteristic decoupling time history curves for each kinematic measurement. Exemplary frequency spectra indicating characteristic decoupling frequencies are also described. Researchers using boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguards should be aware of their limitations when interpreting results and should seek to address decoupling through advanced post-processing techniques when possible.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03550-9en
dc.identifier.eissn1573-9686en
dc.identifier.issn0090-6964en
dc.identifier.issue10en
dc.identifier.pmid38955890en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/138910en
dc.identifier.volume52en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectInstrumented mouthguarden
dc.subjectBoil-and-biteen
dc.subjectDecouplingen
dc.subjectMeasurement erroren
dc.subjectHeaden
dc.subjectImpacten
dc.subjectKinematicsen
dc.titleInstrumented Mouthguard Decoupling Affects Measured Head Kinematic Accuracyen
dc.title.serialAnnals of Biomedical Engineeringen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GellnerInstrumented.pdf
Size:
6.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version