Perspectives of Paid Panel Survey Research in Cybercrime Victimization and Offending: Validity of global online market research sampling and data collection

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorParti, Katalinen
dc.contributor.authorDearden, Thomas E.en
dc.contributor.authorHawdon, James E.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-26T12:07:14Zen
dc.date.available2024-08-26T12:07:14Zen
dc.date.issued2024-08-27en
dc.description.abstractSurveys are common tools for gathering data on myriad topics, including the study of online deviance and cybercrime. Topics such as teen cybervictimization (Wright et al., 2021), differential association and self-control applied to cybercrime (Dearden & Parti, 2021), cyber hatred (Reichelmann & Costello, 2021), cybercrime and institutional anomie theory (Dearden et al., 2021), and cybercrime and COVID (Hawdon et al., 2020; Kemp et al., 2021) have been studied using the non-probability data collected from online panels and tools such as Mechanical Turk. However, the validity of these data is of concern. This chapter considers the validity of using online polling for cybercrime data. First, we compare data from two of the most prominent global data vendors. Next, we use a control question about the 2020 presidential election. This item allows us to consider the validity of both internet-polling services by comparing our online surveys with data from FiveThirtyEight’s “polls-only” and actual election results. Finally, we provide estimates of cybercrime offending and victimization from our data, and we discuss the differences in the estimates from the two samples.en
dc.description.notesYes (Peer reviewed?)en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper was sponsored by the Institute of Society, Culture and Environment at Virginia Tech and the Center for Peace Studies and Violence Prevention at Virginia Tech.en
dc.description.version1st (Edition)en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extentPages 91-109en
dc.format.extent18 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier6 (Chapter number)en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003277675-8en
dc.identifier.isbn1032234474en
dc.identifier.isbn9781032234472en
dc.identifier.orcidParti, Katalin [0000-0002-8484-3237]en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/121005en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Routledge International Handbook of Online Devianceen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge International Handbooksen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003277675-8/perspectives-paid-panel-survey-research-cybercrime-victimization-offending-katalin-parti-thomas-dearden-james-hawdon?context=ubx&refId=08dfc222-09e6-4c8d-8cf2-896445d3f3c5en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectcyberdevianceen
dc.subjectmeasurementen
dc.subjectpaid panel surveyen
dc.subjectsurveyen
dc.subjectFiveThirtyEighten
dc.subjectPresidential electionen
dc.titlePerspectives of Paid Panel Survey Research in Cybercrime Victimization and Offending: Validity of global online market research sampling and data collectionen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherChapteren
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-08-01en
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciencesen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences/Sociologyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences/CLAHS T&R Facultyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Parti Dearden Hawdon_RIHOD_Proof.pdf
Size:
629.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

All Faculty Deposits
Scholarly Works, Sociology