Special Education and STEM Education Teacher Credentials and Instructional Preparedness for Inclusive STEM Education

dc.contributor.authorRossi, Louis Alfonso IIIen
dc.contributor.committeechairErnst, Jeremy V.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBaum Walker, Liesl M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHicks, Daviden
dc.contributor.committeememberWilliams, Thomas O.en
dc.contributor.departmentEducation, Vocational-Technicalen
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-06T08:00:32Zen
dc.date.available2018-07-06T08:00:32Zen
dc.date.issued2018-07-05en
dc.description.abstractIn an effort to meet the demands of industry within society, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education has been a major push for the United States Government resulting in public school system reform. As STEM education begins to become integrated across disciplines and special areas of public schools, and the population of inclusive classrooms containing Students with Disabilities continues to rise, a very important question must be fully investigated and answered. We must ask: Do first year Secondary STEM Education and Special Education teachers have the instructional preparedness to effectively teach all populations of students within their classrooms? And do STEM education and Special Education teachers have the appropriate content credentials to effectively support the diverse needs of students and curriculum in an inclusive STEM education class? This dissertation consists of two research studies that examine Special Education and STEM Education teachers preparedness (coursework and professional development) and content credentials to educate Students with Disabilities within an inclusive STEM Education classroom. This study will be utilizing a secondary analysis of the 2011- 2012 School and Staffing Survey Teacher Questionnaire (SASS TQ) datasets to conduct national analysis of how Special Education and STEM Education teachers degrees, state-level certification areas, and professional development participation reflect potential indicators of preparedness to educate in an inclusive STEM education classroom. The first study focuses on well-known approaches for the instruction of STEM Education and Special Education. This study will utilize differentiated instruction, behavior management, and data to drive instruction as best classroom approaches to instruction to determine their identifiable differences in instructional preparedness among first year STEM educators and first year Special Education teachers. The second study utilizes the 2011-2012 SASS TQ datasets to analyze Special Educators credentials to teach STEM compared to STEM educators credentials to teach Special Education. This study will analyze and compare credentials and backgrounds of STEM educators and Special Educators in search of indicators for preparedness for Inclusive STEM education.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralSociety has and continues to rely on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) research and applications to solve many of its novel problems and push the boundaries for innovations which seek the betterment of humanity. This has led to recent educational focuses on STEM content and concepts which has resulted in reforms throughout the United States school systems. While STEM education has become a major focus within our school systems there has also been a reported increase in the number of special education students attending STEM education coursework. This educational shift towards STEM subjects combined with the increase of students with disabilities has led to an unprecedented amount of STEM classrooms containing students with disabilities. Since students with disabilities require unique programing and teaching strategies to be successful there increase in population has not only changed the roles and responsibilities for educators but has also created new challenges for both regular and special education teachers. This has raised the importance of evaluating both STEM and special education teacher’s instructional preparedness and content expertise to teach STEM subjects to all students, including students with disabilities. The two research studies reported within this dissertation use a national data set to examine special education and STEM education teachers’ coursework, professional development and content credentials to identify their preparedness to educate Students with Disabilities within a STEM Education classroom containing students with disabilities. These studies conducted a secondary analysis to determine how special education and STEM education teachers’ degrees, state-level certification areas, and professional development participation reflect as potential indicators of preparedness to educate in a STEM education classroom containing students with disabilities.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:15430en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/83868en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectSpecial educationen
dc.subjectSTEM educationen
dc.subjectSchool and Staffing Survey Teacher Questionnaireen
dc.subjectInclusive STEM educationen
dc.subjectTeacher preparednessen
dc.titleSpecial Education and STEM Education Teacher Credentials and Instructional Preparedness for Inclusive STEM Educationen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rossi_LA_D_2018.pdf
Size:
637.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rossi_LA_D_2018_support_3.pdf
Size:
19.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rossi_LA_D_2018_support_1.pdf
Size:
99.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents