Reproductive performance of dorset ewes in the star accelerated lambing system

Reproductive performance of Dorset ewes in the Cornell University STAR accelerated lambing program was evaluated. This program consists of five 30-d concurrent breeding and lambing periods per year beginning on January 1 (Sl), March 15 (S2), May 27 (S3), August 8 (S4) and October 20 (S5). Optimally, a ewe could lamb every 7.2 mo beginning at 1 yr of age, Records on 1,084 ewes over 7 yr beginning S1, 1982 Reproductive traits considered were ewe fertility, prolificacy, days to first lambing (DFL) and days between lambing (DBL).

Fertility and prolificacy differed (P < .001) by exposure seasons. Exposure during favorable seasons (S1, S4, S5) increased fertility (P < .001) and prolificacy (P < .01) over that observed in unfavorable seasons (S2, S3). On average, first lambing occurred at 476 ± 5 d with ewe lambs first exposed during S1, S4 and S5 lambing at younger ages (P < .001). Ewes had more DBL (P < .001) if initial exposure following lambing occurred during an unfavorable season.

A curvilinear relationship of ewe age with fertility (P < .001) , prolificacy (P < .01) and DBL (P < .05) was observed in ewes less than 4 yr old. At first exposure following lambing, fertility was lower (P < .001) than at subsequent exposures and ewes that had nursed lambs were less prolific (P < .01) than those that had not. Prolificacy and nursing status had little effect on fertility or DBL (P > .10).

Fertility was transformed to an underlying liability scale based on the expected fertility of ewes of a given age and reproductive history. Variance components were estimated by least-squares (LS) and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) procedures. First-exposure fertility was not heritable. heritabilities for fertility at first post-lambing exposure, first-lambing prolificacy, and second-lambing prolificacy were .191 ± .088 (LS) and .200 ± .132 (REML), .914 ± .091 (LS) and .158 ± .144 (REML), and .168 ± .082 (LS) and .210 ± .137 (REML), respectively. Genetic variation in DFL (P < .01) and DBL (P < .001) was found. Although intrasire ewe variation was detected for prolificacy (P < .001) and DBL (P < .01), repeatability estimates were low and smaller than heritability.