"Meat of the Future": Evaluation of the sensory characteristics of cell-cultured and traditional meat products
dc.contributor.author | To, Kezia Virellia | en |
dc.contributor.committeechair | Lahne, Jacob | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Miller, Chreston Allen | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | O'Keefe, Sean F. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Boyer, Renee Raiden | en |
dc.contributor.department | Food Science and Technology | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-01T08:00:57Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-01T08:00:57Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04-30 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Cell-cultured meat (CM), a meat alternative grown in vitro, is increasingly promoted as conventional meat produced more sustainably. Consumer acceptance remains a critical factor for CM's success. Thus, despite CM's limited availability consumer acceptance of CM has been widely investigated and promoted through optimistic framing – narrative emphasizing only the benefits of CM. This dissertation presents evidence for current knowledge of CM's sensory characteristics, the complex consumer attitudes, and a promising novel method of meat product evaluation as CM comes closer to reality. A structured scoping review of peer-reviewed literature revealed that empirical sensory evaluations of CM are rare, with most studies relying on hypothetical scenarios framed optimistically. Out of 26 studies presented, participants in only one study tasted real CM. Such practices highlight a need for unbiased research to clarify CM's sensory attributes and establish realistic consumer expectations. Consumer perception of CM is also influenced by how information is framed. A survey of U.S. adults (N=1003) demonstrated that optimistic framing enhances willingness to try and purchase CM, emphasizing sustainability, curiosity, and animal welfare, while pessimistic framing reduces interest, driven by concerns over safety and perceptions of "fake" meat. Additionally, rapid sensory profiling methods, such as projective mapping (PM) and free linking (FL), were assessed for seasoned meat products using untrained panelists (N=70). These methods proved effective in discriminating and describing samples while increasing efficiency in evaluating complex food products, suggesting efficacy for meat product evaluation; a promising approach for CM assessments. Together, these insights offer guidance for researchers and industry stakeholders working to advance sustainable protein solutions. | en |
dc.description.abstractgeneral | Cell-cultured meat (CM) is a new type of "meat" made from animal cells in a lab. It is often promoted as similar to regular meat but better for the environment. Understanding how it tastes and how people feel about it is important as CM becomes more available. This research looks at what is known about CM's sensory qualities, how people react to it, and new ways to evaluate meat products. A review of studies about CM showed that most research has not tasted actual CM. Instead, most studies used imagined scenarios, which may lead to biased conclusions. Out of 26 studies, only one study tasted real CM. Therefore, more real-world testing is needed to understand CM's sensory qualities and how people might respond to its taste. People's opinions about CM are also influenced by how it is described. In a survey with 1,003 adults from the U.S., positive descriptions made people more curious and willing to try CM, focusing on ideas like sustainability and helping animals. Negative descriptions, however, led to concerns about safety and the idea of "fake" meat. In addition, rapid sensory testing methods like projective mapping (PM) and free linking (FL) were tested using 70 people evaluating seasoned meat products. These methods worked well for comparing and describing different samples, showing they might also be useful for evaluating CM in the future. Overall, this research gives new insights into how CM is evaluated and perceived, offering ideas for researchers and the food industry to better understand this innovative type of meat. | en |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:43074 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/128267 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | rapid sensory evaluation | en |
dc.subject | consumer | en |
dc.subject | topic modelling | en |
dc.subject | sentiment analysis | en |
dc.title | "Meat of the Future": Evaluation of the sensory characteristics of cell-cultured and traditional meat products | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Food Science and Technology | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1