Characterization and communicative analysis of wildlife managers and recreational users of VirginiaĆ¢ s Wildlife Management Areas

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCarrozzino-Lyon, Amy L.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairParkhurst, James A.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairMcMullin, Steve L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMunsell, John F.en
dc.contributor.committeememberStern, Marc J.en
dc.contributor.departmentFisheries and Wildlife Sciencesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:12:45Zen
dc.date.adate2012-06-20en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:12:45Zen
dc.date.issued2012-05-01en
dc.date.rdate2012-06-20en
dc.date.sdate2012-06-05en
dc.description.abstractThe Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) manages wildlife management areas (WMAs) to provide wildlife habitat and hunting and fishing opportunities, along with opportunities for compatible wildlife-related recreation. Despite having responsibility for managing 39 WMAs, comprising more than 200,000 acres, VDGIF had only anecdotal information about who recreated on Virginia's WMAs, to what extent, and how they felt about management of the WMAs. My goals were to (1) determine the types and amount of recreational use WMAs receive, (2) describe and compare VDGIF managers' and WMA users' current attitudes and perceptions toward land management, and (3) determine if a methods bias existed between surveys administered online and through U.S. mail. I observed diverse recreational use totaling > 90,000 annual recreational user days on the 10 WMAs included in the study. Most visitors were satisfied with their visit, agreed with the use of most land management practices presented, and were willing to continue to visit a WMA if an annual fee was imposed. Co-orientation analysis revealed low agreement and low accuracy, suggesting a need to improve awareness and recognition of managers' and stakeholders' attitudes toward land management. Addressing areas where agreement already exists, but may not be recognized, should be a top priority. Areas of greater disparity will prove difficult to address, but attention is critical to successfully implement WMA management objectives. Wildlife value orientations differed between VDGIF managers and WMA users; VDGIF personnel were predominantly Utilitarian (54%, n=35), whereas WMA users were predominantly Pluralist (63%, n=381). Value orientations did not relate strongly to opinions of land management. Demographics differed between web and paper respondents, with slightly younger, more urban and more educated respondents electing to complete the web-based survey more often. Value orientations toward wildlife and attitudes toward land management did not differ between web and paper respondents, suggesting little influence of values and attitudes on the survey mode selected. Increasingly diverse stakeholders and limited funding sources continue to challenge state wildlife agencies. Specific engagement techniques should strengthen interpersonal relationships and collaboration between the agency and its stakeholders.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-06052012-132041en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06052012-132041/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/27955en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartCarrozzinoLyon_AL_D_2012.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectco-orientationen
dc.subjectcommunicationen
dc.subjectstate wildlife agencyen
dc.subjectstakeholdersen
dc.subjectland managementen
dc.titleCharacterization and communicative analysis of wildlife managers and recreational users of VirginiaĆ¢ s Wildlife Management Areasen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineFisheries and Wildlife Sciencesen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CarrozzinoLyon_AL_D_2012.pdf
Size:
11.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations