The Econometrics of Piecewise Linear Budget Constraints With Skewed Error Distributons: An Application To Housing Demand In The Presence Of Capital Gains Taxation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorYan, Zhengen
dc.contributor.committeechairRosenthal, Stuarten
dc.contributor.committeememberAshley, Richard A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberYe, Keyingen
dc.contributor.committeememberSpanos, Arisen
dc.contributor.committeememberSalehi-Isfahani, Djavaden
dc.contributor.committeememberMurphy, Russell D.en
dc.contributor.departmentEconomics (Arts and Sciences)en
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:15:02Zen
dc.date.adate1999-08-14en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:15:02Zen
dc.date.issued1999-07-23en
dc.date.rdate2000-08-14en
dc.date.sdate1999-08-10en
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the extent to which thin markets in conjunction with tax induced kinks in the budget constraint cause consumer demand to be skewed. To illustrate the principles I focus on the demand for owner-occupied housing. Housing units are indivisible and heterogeneous while tastes for housing are at least partly idiosyncratic, causing housing markets to be thin. In addition, prior to 1998, capital gains tax provisions introduced a sharp kink in the budget constraint of existing owner-occupiers in search of a new home: previous homeowners under age 55 paid no capital gains tax if they bought up, but were subject to capital gains tax if they bought down. I first characterize the economic conditions under which households err on the up or down side when choosing a home in the presence of a thin market and a kinked budget constraint. I then specify an empirical model that takes such effects into account. Results based on Monte Carlo experiments indicate that failing to allow for skewness in the demand for housing leads to biased estimates of the elasticities of demand when such skewness is actually present. In addition, estimates based on American Housing Survey data suggest that such bias is substantial: controlling for skewness reduces the price elasticity of demand among previous owner-occupiers from 1.6 to 0.3. Moreover, 58% of previous homeowners err on the up while only 42% err on the down side. Thus, housing demand is skewed.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-081099-142140en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-081099-142140/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/28606en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartETD.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectHeterogeneity Erroren
dc.subjectConvex Budget Seten
dc.subjectMeasurement Erroren
dc.subjectThin Marketen
dc.subjectSkewnessen
dc.subjectTwo-Error Demand Modelen
dc.subjectKinken
dc.subjectHousing Demanden
dc.subjectPiecewise-Linear Budget Constrainten
dc.titleThe Econometrics of Piecewise Linear Budget Constraints With Skewed Error Distributons: An Application To Housing Demand In The Presence Of Capital Gains Taxationen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineEconomicsen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETD.pdf
Size:
399.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations