Recovery of southern Appalachian streams from historical agriculture

dc.contributor.authorMcTammany, Matthew E.en
dc.contributor.committeechairBenfield, Ernest F.en
dc.contributor.committeememberVoshell, J. Reese Jr.en
dc.contributor.committeememberValett, H. Mauriceen
dc.contributor.committeememberWebster, Jackson R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberWynne, Randolph H.en
dc.contributor.departmentBiologyen
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-22T19:02:30Zen
dc.date.adate2004-07-27en
dc.date.available2011-08-22T19:02:30Zen
dc.date.issued2004-04-30en
dc.date.rdate2004-07-27en
dc.date.sdate2004-07-20en
dc.description.abstractStream ecosystems are influenced by the surrounding landscape, and agriculture within their catchments has changed many characteristics of streams. Agriculture has been a prominent land use activity in the southern Appalachian Mountains of the eastern United States for over 500 years. However, recent socioeconomic changes in the region have caused many farmers to abandon agriculture leading to widespread reforestation of historical farmland. I investigated the influence of agriculture on the physical, chemical, and biological structure and ecosystem processes of streams in the southern Appalachians. In addition, I studied streams in watersheds previously agricultural but currently reforested to determine how historic agriculture generates long-term effects on streams. Stream draining agricultural catchments (i.e., agricultural streams) had higher temperatures, light inputs, nutrients, and suspended sediments than forested streams and contained smaller substrate, dominated by sand and silt. Temperature and light regimes recovered in streams of reforested catchments, but the other aspects of stream physicochemistry remained elevated or changed due to historical agriculture. I expected biological community structure and ecosystem processes to reflect these altered conditions in streams with current and historical agriculture. Higher chlorophyll, lower macroinvertebrate biodiversity, fewer shredder-detritivore invertebrates, and more pollution-tolerant organisms characterized agricultural streams compared to forested streams, but each of these biological features was similar in long-term forested streams and streams with reforested catchments but with agricultural histories. Agricultural streams had higher rates of gross primary production (GPP) and GPP to respiration (P/R) ratios than forested streams, indicating that agriculture enhances autotrophic metabolism in streams. Agriculture did not have a significant effect on wood breakdown or microbial biofilm development on wood substrates. Together, these data suggest that agriculture causes many different changes in stream physical and chemical properties and that many of these properties do not recover following reforestation of catchments over the past 50 years. However, biological community structure and ecosystem processes appear to respond to physical aspects of streams that do recover from historic agriculture including light, temperature, and organic matter supply and type.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.otheretd-07202004-131659en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-07202004-131659en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/11210en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartMcTDiss_23July2004.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectrespirationen
dc.subjectprimary productionen
dc.subjectinvertebratesen
dc.subjectstreamen
dc.subjectagricultureen
dc.subjectWooden
dc.titleRecovery of southern Appalachian streams from historical agricultureen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineBiologyen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McTDiss_23July2004.pdf
Size:
822.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format