Building research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a pilot scientific writing workshop in Cameroon

dc.contributor.authorDabou, Solangeen
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Valery N.en
dc.contributor.authorDongho, Ghyslaine B. D.en
dc.contributor.authorNanseu, Evrard M. K.en
dc.contributor.authorSinsai, Regina Y.en
dc.contributor.authorAsahngwa, Constantine T.en
dc.contributor.authorKibu, Odette D.en
dc.contributor.authorGoupeyou-Youmsi, Jessyen
dc.contributor.authorCheuyem, Fabrice Z. L.en
dc.contributor.authorConner, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorGobina, Ronald M.en
dc.contributor.authorForetia, Denis A.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-23T13:22:32Zen
dc.date.available2026-02-23T13:22:32Zen
dc.date.issued2026-01-24en
dc.date.updated2026-02-22T04:25:52Zen
dc.description.abstractObjective: Sub-Saharan Africa produces less than 4% of global scientific output, despite significant health and development challenges. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a pilot scientific writing workshop in Cameroon aimed at building writing skills and publication readiness of early career researchers. We conducted two workshops’ sessions in Yaoundé, Cameroon, in April and November 2023. A mixed-methods approach was used. Quantitative data were obtained via pre- and post-workshop questionnaires designed to capture participants’ self-assessed knowledge, skills, and confidence related to the workshop content. Qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to the survey data, and thematic content analysis was used to assess qualitative responses. Results: A total of 86 participants completed both the pre- and post-workshop surveys (response rate: 86.9%). The majority had never published scientific papers (62.8%) nor had they received formal writing training (61.6%). The quantitative results showed statistically significant improvements in participants’ overall understanding of scientific writing and publishing (mean difference = 0.93, p < 0.001) and confidence regarding writing skills (mean difference = 0.94, p < 0.001). Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed high satisfaction with the learning environment, perceived knowledge gains, and a strong demand for mentorship and sustained training opportunities. Highlights: Most of the participants (61.6%) had never completed a scientific writing or publication course. Almost two thirds (62.8%) had never published a scientific paper before. Participants reported increased knowledge, skills and confidence in scientific communication. Junior researchers in Africa seek consistent mentorship and training opportunities.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationBMC Research Notes. 2026 Jan 24;19(1):82en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07666-0en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/141507en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.titleBuilding research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a pilot scientific writing workshop in Cameroonen
dc.title.serialBMC Research Notesen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13104_2026_Article_7666.pdf
Size:
1018.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: