Developing Heuristics to Optimize the Configuration of the Video-Mediated Environment

dc.contributor.authorGrenville, N. Deliaen
dc.contributor.committeechairKleiner, Brian M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSmith-Jackson, Tonya L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberRosson, Mary Bethen
dc.contributor.committeememberWilliges, Robert C.en
dc.contributor.committeememberDenson, Mila W.en
dc.contributor.departmentIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:11:24Zen
dc.date.adate2001-05-08en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:11:24Zen
dc.date.issued2001-04-11en
dc.date.rdate2002-05-08en
dc.date.sdate2001-05-02en
dc.description.abstractA study was conducted to determine the preferences for the design of distributed meeting rooms used for video enhanced electronic meeting systems (VEMS). Although there is a significant body of literature in the group communication domain, the research in this multidisciplinary area has paid minimal attention to users' environmental preferences in the design of a meeting space. A basic science approach through three studies was used to explore the variables that defined the design of a distributed meeting space from the user's perspective. Twenty-five inexperienced college-enrolled participants and twenty-five experienced Naval professionals used foam-core pieces to create a design of their ideal distributed meeting space. Thirty-seven variables were used to categorize qualitative attributes of the designs. Three types of designs emerged from the sample population: v-shaped, conference (u-shaped or oval), and theater (auditorium) style. A nonexperimental design was used to measure the impact of the heuristics on the users' physical design of their distributed meeting spaces. Post-meeting evaluation results were promising and indicated that the heuristics were usable and that participating in the design could have a positive impact on user's subjective rating of their meeting experience. Overall, inexperienced users did not believe that the heuristics were necessary to determine the best room design for their team's needs. In the third study, six experts conducted an expert evaluation of a distributed meeting room site. Most experts were not able to identify context-specific design issues such as camera angle and lighting with the static information that they were provided. The experts subjective ratings indicated that the heuristics were usable and were useful for room designers. The overall findings indicated that experience level had a significant impact on user's perception of important equipment in a distributed meeting room. Naïve users were more concerned with visual communication and assigned more importance to public displays (p=.035). Experienced users were more concerned with audio communication and assigned more importance to microphone control (p=.024). In addition, general findings from this research include a new methodology for generating participatory ergonomic tools.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-05022001-160336en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05022001-160336/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/27489en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartBackmatter.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartstudy1.PDFen
dc.relation.haspartetd.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectParticipatory Ergonomicsen
dc.subjectHeuristicsen
dc.subjectParticipatory Designen
dc.subjectElectronic Meeting Systemsen
dc.subjectRoom Designen
dc.subjectVideo Teleconferencingen
dc.subjectMacroergonomicsen
dc.subjectDistributed meetingsen
dc.titleDeveloping Heuristics to Optimize the Configuration of the Video-Mediated Environmenten
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
study1.PDF
Size:
32.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Backmatter.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format