Hydrodynamic and structural constraints on ammonoid shell shape

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, David Kelleren
dc.contributor.committeecochairBambach, Richard K.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairGilinsky, Norma L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBenfield, Ernest F.en
dc.contributor.committeememberLandman, N. L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberPorter, Duncan M.en
dc.contributor.departmentGeological Sciencesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:18:12Zen
dc.date.adate2008-08-25en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:18:12Zen
dc.date.issued1990-08-05en
dc.date.rdate2008-08-25en
dc.date.sdate2008-08-25en
dc.description.abstractThis work examines the structural role of the ammonoid shell in supporting hydrostatic load and the role of shell shape in facilitating swimming. The history of studies of the role of the shell in supporting hydrostatic load is discussed first, and is followed by an analysis of the function of the septal suture. The discussion of swimming consists of a critique of the previous work which emphasized the use of Nautilus as a modem analogue for swimming in ammonoids. This is followed by a discussion of flow tank studies that I conducted to examine the role of shell shape in drag production and power consumption of swimming in ammonoids. It had long been thought that the the shells of chambered cephalopods served as buoyancy compensation devices. However, it was not until the 1960's that the internal pressure of the shell was demonstrated to be less than one atmosphere, and that the shell structure supports hydrostatic load. It is remarkable that the internal pressure of cephalopod shells was not ascertained until the 1960s. As early as 1832 the great anatomist Richard Owen called for an empirical investigation of this subject. Functional and adaptive explanations were in vogue in Owen's time as a consequence of William Paley's argument from design. During the late 19th and early 20th century adaptation and functional explanations were no longer emphasized in the interpretation of morphology; non-adaptive evolutionary ideas in vogue in this time period stressed the role of development as a guiding force. It was not until the mid 20th century that there was renewed interest in cephalopod functional morphology and the role of the shell in resisting implosion was ascertained.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.extentix, 200 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-08252008-161954en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08252008-161954/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/39231en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1990.J347.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 23663452en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1990.J347en
dc.subject.lcshCephalopoda -- Anatomyen
dc.titleHydrodynamic and structural constraints on ammonoid shell shapeen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineGeological Sciencesen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1990.J347.pdf
Size:
10.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations