Using musculoskeletal models to estimate the effects of exoskeletons on spine loads during dynamic lifting tasks: differences between OpenSim and the AnyBody modelling system

dc.contributor.authorBehjati Ashtiani, Mohamaden
dc.contributor.authorAkhavanfar, Mohammadhosseinen
dc.contributor.authorLi, Lingyuen
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sunwooken
dc.contributor.authorNussbaum, Maury A.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-02T15:09:04Zen
dc.date.available2025-06-02T15:09:04Zen
dc.date.issued2025-05-23en
dc.description.abstractOccupational back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) can reduce physical demands during lifting by providing assistive torques, but their effects on spine loading are poorly understood. In this study, we used two common musculoskeletal models developed in OpenSim and the AnyBody Modeling System to estimate intervertebral joint forces (IJF) during asymmetric and symmetric lifting tasks with and without BSEs. Data from an earlier study were used, involving 18 participants who performed repetitive lowering/lifting in three task conditions and with three different BSEs (along with a control condition using no BSE). We simulated the tasks with both models and estimated axial compression and anteroposterior shear forces at the L4/L5 joint and derived peak values (95th percentile) as outcome measures. OpenSim estimated significantly larger axial compression and anteroposterior shear forces than AMS. Both models estimated reductions in spine loading when using either of the BSEs, though OpenSim estimated greater reductions than AMS. Strong positive, linear relationships (r > 0.95) between the two model estimates were found for axial compression, while much weaker and even negative relationships were observed for shear forces, especially under asymmetric conditions. The differences in model estimates were likely due to variations in model assumptions and passive tissue representations. Future research should explore more detailed human-exoskeleton interaction models, evaluate the impact of modelling assumptions on IJF estimates, and assess the agreement of these findings with in vivo measurements such as electromyography.en
dc.description.notesSource info: BM-D-25-00171en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier112780 (Article number)en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112780en
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2380en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9290en
dc.identifier.orcidNussbaum, Maury [0000-0002-1887-8431]en
dc.identifier.otherS0021-9290(25)00292-1 (PII)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/134971en
dc.identifier.volume188en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40441118en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectAnyBody modelling systemen
dc.subjectBack-support exoskeletonsen
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal modellingen
dc.subjectOpenSimen
dc.subjectSpineen
dc.titleUsing musculoskeletal models to estimate the effects of exoskeletons on spine loads during dynamic lifting tasks: differences between OpenSim and the AnyBody modelling systemen
dc.title.serialJournal of Biomechanicsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherJournal Articleen
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-05-22en
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/Industrial and Systems Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Faculty of Health Sciencesen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/COE T&R Facultyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Behjati Ashtiani DEPOSIT.pdf
Size:
3.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: