How elementary classroom teachers make instructional adaptations for mainstreamed students with mental retardation: a case study

dc.contributor.authorDyer, Ronald E.en
dc.contributor.committeechairHutson, Barbara A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberCline, Marvin Geralden
dc.contributor.committeememberGatewood, Thomas E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberJones, Philip R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberUnderwood, Kenneth E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberJanney, R.en
dc.contributor.departmentCurriculum and Instructionen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:14:06Zen
dc.date.adate2008-06-06en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:14:06Zen
dc.date.issued1992-11-15en
dc.date.rdate2008-06-06en
dc.date.sdate2008-06-06en
dc.description.abstractA descriptive case study was designed to investigate how classroom teachers plan and implement instructional adaptations and accommodations for mainstreamed students. Two elementary school classroom teachers, each receiving two mainstreamed students with mental retardation, were observed to determine factors and strategies involved in making instructional adaptations and accommodations. Preactive teaching processes, including consultative and collaborative planning activities, and classroom teacher perceptions about mainstreaming practices were examined. Results indicated five primary types of instructional adaptations: acquisitional, parallel, enabling-social, enabling-academic, and structural. In addition, two other strategies were observed: accommodations and return to the resource room for mainstreamed students. Findings indicated acquisitional adaptations facilitated the integration of mainstreamed students, structural adaptations powerfully affected classroom climate and students' interpersonal relationships for both mainstreamed and nondisabled students, and parallel adaptations had both positive and negative social and instructional implications for mainstreamed students. Enabling-social and enabling-academic adaptations produced increased mainstreamed student participation in classroom instructional activities and experiences. Benefits were found for nondisabled students as well. Preactive teaching processes included variable use of consultative and collaborative strategies and some use of instructional adaptation planning’ routines. Teachers'! planning processes changed over the course of the year; adaptation-making processes moved from the preactive to the interactive teaching phase. Teachers' reported perceptions of mainstreaming varied during the study, but generally remained positive. Based on these results, a taxonomy of descriptions of instructional adaptations as well as descriptions of classroom teachers' planning processes as strategies for mainstreaming students with mental retardation in general education classroom instructional activities and classroom teachers' perceptions of the mainstreaming program were derived.en
dc.description.degreeEd. D.en
dc.format.extentviii, 233 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-06062008-170109en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-170109/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/38381en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1992.D947.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 27645715en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1992.D947en
dc.subject.lcshChildren with mental disabilities -- Education (Elementary)en
dc.subject.lcshElementary school teachersen
dc.subject.lcshMainstreaming in educationen
dc.titleHow elementary classroom teachers make instructional adaptations for mainstreamed students with mental retardation: a case studyen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1992.D947.pdf
Size:
10.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: